From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlnZi-0000r8-Vh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:27:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlnZd-0006c5-Jg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:27:14 -0500 Received: from speedy.comstyle.com ([2001:470:1d:8c::2]:38309 helo=mail.comstyle.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlnZd-0006aJ-6b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:27:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:26:52 -0500 From: Brad Smith Message-ID: <20131127221803.GA31859@rox.home.comstyle.com> References: <20131124205256.GA23884@rox.home.comstyle.com> <87r4a1fxng.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r4a1fxng.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-1.7] Fix QEMU build on OpenBSD on x86 archs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:32:51AM -0800, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Brad Smith writes: > > > This resolves the build issue with building the ROMs on OpenBSD on x86 archs. > > As of OpenBSD 5.3 the compiler builds PIE binaries by default and thus the > > whole OS/packages and so forth. The ROMs need to have PIE disabled. This > > is my initial attempt at trying to get somehting upstream so that QEMU > > both builds out of the box and to resolve the build issue with the > > buildbots that has been around for awhile. We have a patch in our ports > > tree but it is just the flags hardcoded into the Makefile which obviously > > is not appropriate for upstream. > > > > From the OpenBSD buildbots.. > > Building optionrom/multiboot.img > > ld: multiboot.o: relocation R_X86_64_16 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > > > > > > Signed-off by: Brad Smith > > > > diff --git a/configure b/configure > > index 508f6a5..7f060a4 100755 > > --- a/configure > > +++ b/configure > > @@ -1342,6 +1342,10 @@ EOF > > if compile_prog "-fPIE -DPIE" "-pie"; then > > QEMU_CFLAGS="-fPIE -DPIE $QEMU_CFLAGS" > > LDFLAGS="-pie $LDFLAGS" > > + if test "$targetos" == OpenBSD; then > > '==' is not portable syntax. You need to use '='. Doh. My bad. > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > > + CC_NOPIE="-fno-pie" > > + LD_NOPIE="-nopie" > > + fi > > pie="yes" > > if compile_prog "" "-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now" ; then > > LDFLAGS="-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now $LDFLAGS" > > @@ -4307,6 +4311,8 @@ if test "$gcov" = "yes" ; then > > echo "CONFIG_GCOV=y" >> $config_host_mak > > echo "GCOV=$gcov_tool" >> $config_host_mak > > fi > > +echo "CC_NOPIE=$CC_NOPIE" >> $config_host_mak > > +echo "LD_NOPIE=$LD_NOPIE" >> $config_host_mak > > > > # use included Linux headers > > if test "$linux" = "yes" ; then > > diff --git a/pc-bios/optionrom/Makefile b/pc-bios/optionrom/Makefile > > index 57d8bd0..0b35000 100644 > > --- a/pc-bios/optionrom/Makefile > > +++ b/pc-bios/optionrom/Makefile > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ $(call set-vpath, $(SRC_PATH)/pc-bios/optionrom) > > CFLAGS := -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin > > CFLAGS += -I$(SRC_PATH) > > CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, $(CFLAGS), -fno-stack-protector) > > +CFLAGS += $(CC_NOPIE) > > QEMU_CFLAGS = $(CFLAGS) > > > > build-all: multiboot.bin linuxboot.bin kvmvapic.bin > > @@ -20,7 +21,7 @@ build-all: multiboot.bin linuxboot.bin kvmvapic.bin > > .SECONDARY: > > > > %.img: %.o > > - $(call quiet-command,$(LD) -Ttext 0 -e _start -s -o $@ $<," Building $(TARGET_DIR)$@") > > + $(call quiet-command,$(LD) $(LD_NOPIE) -Ttext 0 -e _start -s -o $@ $<," Building $(TARGET_DIR)$@") > > > > %.raw: %.img > > $(call quiet-command,$(OBJCOPY) -O binary -j .text $< $@," Building $(TARGET_DIR)$@") > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.