qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: "Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>,
	kwolf@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V3 3/7] qapi: Add skeletton of command to query a drive bs graph.
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:43:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131205144336.GE2892@irqsave.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52A08FED.7020305@redhat.com>

Le Thursday 05 Dec 2013 à 07:38:37 (-0700), Eric Blake a écrit :
> On 12/05/2013 07:24 AM, Benoît Canet wrote:
> 
> >>
> >> Am I correct that it will be possible to have named nodes that are not
> >> currently associated with any device?  If so, how do we learn about
> >> those nodes?  Would it be better to have a command that returns an array
> >> of structs for all known node roots, with an optional member describing
> >> which device owns that node root?  Something like:
> > 
> > The code have a list of all named nodes but not a list of named nodes roots.
> > Also it's difficult to get the device name for a named node because the bses don't
> > have any backward pointers to their parents.
> > It could be done by recursing into all the blockbackend bs but it's twisted.
> 
> Still worth thinking about how to structure things so we could add it in
> the future if it turns out to be useful to management, but I can
> understand why you aren't providing it right away.
> 
> > 
> > In fact I am wondering if we really need something to spit out the named nodes
> > topology in QMP for the simple reason that the names of the nodes are given by the
> > management so the management should already know the topology.
> 
> There's one case where management might not know - if libvirtd gets
> restarted while in the middle of an operation that was attempting to
> create a named node, then on restart and reconnection to the monitor,
> libvirt would want to query to see if the node actually got created or
> if the command needs to be attempted again.  I'm not a fan of write-only
> interfaces - and making management responsible to track all named nodes
> with no way to query if qemu actually agrees with the topology that
> management thinks it has commanded feels like a write-only interface.

Would a command returning info about a specific named node be sufficient for
libvirt checks ?
It's far less complex to implement than exposing the whole graph.
We could also provide a simple command to list the names of the named nodes.

Best regards

Benoît

> 
> -- 
> Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-05 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-03 13:25 [Qemu-devel] [RFC V3 0/7] Giving names to BlockDriverState graph nodes Benoît Canet
2013-12-03 13:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC V3 1/7] block: Add bs->node_name to hold the name of a bs node of the bs graph Benoît Canet
2013-12-04 23:26   ` Eric Blake
2013-12-03 13:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC V3 2/7] block: Allow the user to define "node-name" option Benoît Canet
2013-12-04 23:33   ` Eric Blake
2013-12-03 13:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC V3 3/7] qapi: Add skeletton of command to query a drive bs graph Benoît Canet
2013-12-04  3:10   ` Fam Zheng
2013-12-04 23:46   ` Eric Blake
2013-12-05 14:24     ` Benoît Canet
2013-12-05 14:38       ` Eric Blake
2013-12-05 14:43         ` Benoît Canet [this message]
2013-12-05 14:59           ` Eric Blake
2013-12-05 16:37             ` Benoît Canet
2013-12-03 13:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC V3 4/7] qmp: Allow block_passwd to manipulate bs graph nodes Benoît Canet
2013-12-04 23:56   ` Eric Blake
2013-12-05 14:12     ` Benoît Canet
2013-12-03 13:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC V3 5/7] qmp: Allow block_resize " Benoît Canet
2013-12-05  0:01   ` Eric Blake
2013-12-03 13:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC V3 6/7] block: Create authorizations mechanism for external snapshots Benoît Canet
2013-12-04  3:35   ` Fam Zheng
2013-12-04  5:22     ` Benoît Canet
2013-12-04  3:47   ` Fam Zheng
2013-12-04  5:20     ` Benoît Canet
2013-12-04  6:12       ` Fam Zheng
2013-12-04  6:34         ` Benoît Canet
2013-12-04  7:03           ` Fam Zheng
2013-12-05 14:52             ` Benoît Canet
2013-12-03 13:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC V3 7/7] qmp: Allow to take external snapshots on bs graphs node Benoît Canet
2013-12-04  3:51   ` Fam Zheng
2013-12-04  5:15     ` Benoît Canet
2013-12-05  0:11   ` Eric Blake
2013-12-05 14:16     ` Benoît Canet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131205144336.GE2892@irqsave.net \
    --to=benoit.canet@irqsave.net \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jcody@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).