qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Will Auld <will.auld@intel.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: clear guest TSC on reset
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:40:00 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131205164000.GA18678@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52A0A37A.7060204@redhat.com>

On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:02:02PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 05/12/2013 16:42, Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao ha scritto:
> > (2013/12/05 22:53), Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 05/12/2013 14:15, Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao ha scritto:
> >>>          /*
> >>>           * KVM is yet unable to synchronize TSC values of multiple VCPUs on
> >>>           * writeback. Until this is fixed, we only write the offset to SMP
> >>>           * guests after migration, desynchronizing the VCPUs, but avoiding
> >>>           * huge jump-backs that would occur without any writeback at all.
> >>>           */
> >>> -        if (smp_cpus == 1 || env->tsc != 0) {
> >>> +        if (smp_cpus == 1 || env->tsc != 0 || level == KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE) {
> >>>              kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_IA32_TSC, env->tsc);
> >>>          }
> >> This is still a bit ugly, and desynchronizes the VCPUs on reset.
> > 
> > I agree it is a bit ugly, but in my testing QEMU seemed to loop over all
> > the VCPUS fast enough for the kernel side kvm_write_tsc() to do a
> > reasonable job of matching the offsets (the Linux guest did not mark
> > the TSC unstable due to the TSCs being unsynchronized). Am I missing
> > something?
> 
> No, probably not.
> 
> > I understand the benefits of what you are proposing but, since it is
> > wider is scope and it would be more difficult to backport, I would
> > prefer to implement it as a follow-up patch, unless you think that
> > the current patch as a standalone fix does more harm than good.
> 
> It does some harm in that it introduces a case where KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE
> restores something, but KVM_PUT_FULL_STATE doesn't.
> 
> If it really usually works, there shouldn't be a need for this "if"
> statement at all.
> 
> Marcelo, what do you think?
> 
> Paolo

Its OK to drop it, provided the following is tested on SMP guests:

1. initialization.
2. reboot.
3. migration.

With both stable and unstable TSC hosts (use wrmsr tool to write TSC on
a given host CPU, to make it an unstable TSC host). (A=rdmsr ; sleep 1s;
wrmsr A).

To make sure the code is not securing against a kvm_write_tsc
cornercase.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-05 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1386054500.25757.10.camel@nexus>
     [not found] ` <529D90A6.2080801@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2013-12-05  6:08   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: clear guest TSC on reset Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2013-12-05  6:15     ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: " Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2013-12-05  9:28       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-05 13:15         ` Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
2013-12-05 13:53           ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-05 15:42             ` Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
2013-12-05 16:02               ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-05 16:40                 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2013-12-05 17:06                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-12-05 16:17               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-12-05 16:38                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-06  8:24                   ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2013-12-06  8:33                     ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1//2 v3] " Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2013-12-06  8:38                       ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] target-i386: do not special case TSC writeback Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2013-12-06  8:36                     ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: clear guest TSC on reset Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-06  8:56                       ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2013-12-06  9:08                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-06  9:20                           ` Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
2013-12-06 14:22                     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-12-09  8:50                       ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2013-12-12  2:52                         ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2013-12-12 12:18                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-05 16:12         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-12-05 16:32           ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131205164000.GA18678@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=will.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).