From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Using BlockdevRef in the block layer
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:45:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131206104510.GB2911@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52A0C77F.8060200@redhat.com>
Am 05.12.2013 um 19:35 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 05.12.2013 18:41, Max Reitz wrote:
> >[…]
> >
> >Second, if specifying a reference to an existing device should
> >really be supported, bdrv_open() should ideally not call
> >bdrv_file_open() anymore, but a function bdrv_find_ref() instead
> >which resolves a BlockdevRef structure (for simplicity, it appears
> >to be easier to use a QDict equivalent to a BlockdevRef instead of
> >the latter itself (since that results in many effectively
> >redundant conversions to and from those representations)).
> >However, bdrv_file_open() supports parsing protocol filenames,
> >which bdrv_find_ref() would not. As a result, it is probably best
> >to call bdrv_find_ref() from bdrv_file_open() instead and leave
> >bdrv_open() generally the way it is right now – yes, this is a
> >question. ;-) (“Do you agree?”)
>
> I noticed only just now that the current design does not seem to
> allow nesting of files (i.e., driver=blkdebug-qmp,
> file.driver=qcow2, file.file.driver=file). Perhaps I do have to call
> bdrv_find_ref() in bdrv_open() and only resort to bdrv_file_open()
> if a filename that must be parsed was given...?
This is supposed to work. If it doesn't work today, it is a bug or
missing implementation rather than a design decision.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-06 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-05 17:41 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Using BlockdevRef in the block layer Max Reitz
2013-12-05 18:35 ` Max Reitz
2013-12-05 19:04 ` Max Reitz
2013-12-06 10:45 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2013-12-06 11:02 ` Max Reitz
2013-12-06 10:43 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-12-06 11:00 ` Max Reitz
2013-12-06 11:14 ` Max Reitz
2013-12-06 11:18 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131206104510.GB2911@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).