* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] eeprom93xx: fix coding style
@ 2013-12-04 6:27 Antony Pavlov
2013-12-04 6:29 ` Stefan Weil
2013-12-06 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Michael Tokarev
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Antony Pavlov @ 2013-12-04 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-trivial, Stefan Weil, Antony Pavlov
scripts/checkpatch.pl reports about some style problems,
this commit fixes some of them:
ERROR: space prohibited before open square bracket '['
+ .fields = (VMStateField []) {
ERROR: space prohibited after that '!' (ctx:BxW)
+ if (! eeprom->eecs && eecs) {
^
ERROR: space prohibited after that '!' (ctx:WxW)
+ } else if (eeprom->eecs && ! eecs) {
^
ERROR: space prohibited after that '!' (ctx:WxW)
+ } else if (eecs && ! eeprom->eesk && eesk) {
^
ERROR: switch and case should be at the same indent
switch (address >> (eeprom->addrbits - 2)) {
+ case 0:
[...]
+ case 1:
[...]
+ case 2:
[...]
+ case 3:
ERROR: return is not a function, parentheses are not required
+ return (eeprom->eedo);
ERROR: switch and case should be at the same indent
switch (nwords) {
+ case 16:
+ case 64:
[...]
+ case 128:
+ case 256:
[...]
+ default:
Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org
---
hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c b/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c
index 08f4df5..a98f924 100644
--- a/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c
+++ b/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_eeprom = {
.version_id = EEPROM_VERSION,
.minimum_version_id = OLD_EEPROM_VERSION,
.minimum_version_id_old = OLD_EEPROM_VERSION,
- .fields = (VMStateField []) {
+ .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
VMSTATE_UINT8(tick, eeprom_t),
VMSTATE_UINT8(address, eeprom_t),
VMSTATE_UINT8(command, eeprom_t),
@@ -157,13 +157,13 @@ void eeprom93xx_write(eeprom_t *eeprom, int eecs, int eesk, int eedi)
logout("CS=%u SK=%u DI=%u DO=%u, tick = %u\n",
eecs, eesk, eedi, eedo, tick);
- if (! eeprom->eecs && eecs) {
+ if (!eeprom->eecs && eecs) {
/* Start chip select cycle. */
logout("Cycle start, waiting for 1st start bit (0)\n");
tick = 0;
command = 0x0;
address = 0x0;
- } else if (eeprom->eecs && ! eecs) {
+ } else if (eeprom->eecs && !eecs) {
/* End chip select cycle. This triggers write / erase. */
if (eeprom->writable) {
uint8_t subcommand = address >> (eeprom->addrbits - 2);
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ void eeprom93xx_write(eeprom_t *eeprom, int eecs, int eesk, int eedi)
}
/* Output DO is tristate, read results in 1. */
eedo = 1;
- } else if (eecs && ! eeprom->eesk && eesk) {
+ } else if (eecs && !eeprom->eesk && eesk) {
/* Raising edge of clock shifts data in. */
if (tick == 0) {
/* Wait for 1st start bit. */
@@ -230,20 +230,20 @@ void eeprom93xx_write(eeprom_t *eeprom, int eecs, int eesk, int eedi)
if (command == 0) {
/* Command code in upper 2 bits of address. */
switch (address >> (eeprom->addrbits - 2)) {
- case 0:
- logout("write disable command\n");
- eeprom->writable = 0;
- break;
- case 1:
- logout("write all command\n");
- break;
- case 2:
- logout("erase all command\n");
- break;
- case 3:
- logout("write enable command\n");
- eeprom->writable = 1;
- break;
+ case 0:
+ logout("write disable command\n");
+ eeprom->writable = 0;
+ break;
+ case 1:
+ logout("write all command\n");
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ logout("erase all command\n");
+ break;
+ case 3:
+ logout("write enable command\n");
+ eeprom->writable = 1;
+ break;
}
} else {
/* Read, write or erase word. */
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ uint16_t eeprom93xx_read(eeprom_t *eeprom)
{
/* Return status of pin DO (0 or 1). */
logout("CS=%u DO=%u\n", eeprom->eecs, eeprom->eedo);
- return (eeprom->eedo);
+ return eeprom->eedo;
}
#if 0
@@ -296,18 +296,18 @@ eeprom_t *eeprom93xx_new(DeviceState *dev, uint16_t nwords)
uint8_t addrbits;
switch (nwords) {
- case 16:
- case 64:
- addrbits = 6;
- break;
- case 128:
- case 256:
- addrbits = 8;
- break;
- default:
- assert(!"Unsupported EEPROM size, fallback to 64 words!");
- nwords = 64;
- addrbits = 6;
+ case 16:
+ case 64:
+ addrbits = 6;
+ break;
+ case 128:
+ case 256:
+ addrbits = 8;
+ break;
+ default:
+ assert(!"Unsupported EEPROM size, fallback to 64 words!");
+ nwords = 64;
+ addrbits = 6;
}
eeprom = (eeprom_t *)g_malloc0(sizeof(*eeprom) + nwords * 2);
--
1.8.4.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] eeprom93xx: fix coding style
2013-12-04 6:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] eeprom93xx: fix coding style Antony Pavlov
@ 2013-12-04 6:29 ` Stefan Weil
2013-12-06 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Michael Tokarev
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Weil @ 2013-12-04 6:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antony Pavlov, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-trivial
Am 04.12.2013 07:27, schrieb Antony Pavlov:
> scripts/checkpatch.pl reports about some style problems,
> this commit fixes some of them:
Reviewed-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] eeprom93xx: fix coding style
2013-12-04 6:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] eeprom93xx: fix coding style Antony Pavlov
2013-12-04 6:29 ` Stefan Weil
@ 2013-12-06 18:59 ` Michael Tokarev
2013-12-07 1:14 ` Antony Pavlov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Tokarev @ 2013-12-06 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antony Pavlov; +Cc: qemu-trivial, Stefan Weil, qemu-devel
04.12.2013 10:27, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> scripts/checkpatch.pl reports about some style problems,
> this commit fixes some of them:
Thanks, applied to trivial-patches queue.
I'm a bit afraid of this sort of patches - there are LOTS of
coding style issues in current qemu code base, and applying
a patch like this may open a really large can of worms...
Generally it has been agreed to fix coding style only when
doing some other code changes nearby, as far as I remember.
/mjt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] eeprom93xx: fix coding style
2013-12-06 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Michael Tokarev
@ 2013-12-07 1:14 ` Antony Pavlov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Antony Pavlov @ 2013-12-07 1:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Tokarev; +Cc: qemu-trivial, Stefan Weil, qemu-devel, Dmitry Smagin
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 22:59:29 +0400
Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> wrote:
> 04.12.2013 10:27, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> > scripts/checkpatch.pl reports about some style problems,
> > this commit fixes some of them:
>
> Thanks, applied to trivial-patches queue.
>
> I'm a bit afraid of this sort of patches - there are LOTS of
> coding style issues in current qemu code base, and applying
> a patch like this may open a really large can of worms...
>
> Generally it has been agreed to fix coding style only when
> doing some other code changes nearby, as far as I remember.
Some times ago there was a patch on adding DEC Tulip NIC support
(see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-11/msg02878.html).
In this patch the 93LC46B Serial EEPROM emulation was added.
But it's like reinventing the wheel because Stefan Weil already
have done this work in 2006! So I used eeprom93xx for the next
tulip patch version and occasionally I fixed some coding style issues.
--
Best regards,
Antony Pavlov
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-07 1:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-04 6:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] eeprom93xx: fix coding style Antony Pavlov
2013-12-04 6:29 ` Stefan Weil
2013-12-06 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Michael Tokarev
2013-12-07 1:14 ` Antony Pavlov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).