From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60215)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1VqP66-0004zp-3v
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:19:47 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1VqP61-0004Ke-E1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:19:42 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41265)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1VqP61-0004Jz-69
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:19:37 -0500
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:19:35 +0100
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20131210151935.GF3656@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com>
References: <877gbdgce4.fsf@elfo.elfo> <52A70B10.7020408@redhat.com>
	<CA+aC4ksD+CSZ4cpXNX=RO=U8u0T+=eixs90WMKVJoQdX4oWbBA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87txegg30t.fsf@elfo.elfo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87txegg30t.fsf@elfo.elfo>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>, qemu-devel qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, KVM devel mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>

Am 10.12.2013 um 16:05 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben:
> Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Il 10/12/2013 12:42, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
> >>>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
> >>
> >> May not need a phone call, but I'll drop it here:
> >
> > Could we move the time on this phone call?  7am conflicts with my
> > daily commute.  I could do 6am or 9am.  I think it would be very
> > useful to be able to attend this call.
> 
> No problem with me.  Both of them are ok for me.
> Votes?

It would have been useful to have a time zone specification because
otherwise the message is pretty meaningless.

Juan said on IRC that that would be 15:00 CET or 18:00 CET. So if his
interpretation is right, I'd vote for 15:00 (i.e. one hour earlier than
it used to be, 14:00 UTC).

Kevin