From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
afaerber@suse.de, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec: separate sections and nodes per address space
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:48:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131210164839.GA5759@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386679832.10879.42.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 02:50:32PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 13:38 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 10/12/2013 13:37, Marcel Apfelbaum ha scritto:
> > >
> > > Beside this it looks OK, the branch does not compile and I couldn't look into it more...
> > > Can you please also merge my other patch
> > > "memory.c: bugfix - ref counting mismatch in memory_region_find" ?
> >
> > Regarding the compilation issue, I suggest rebasing on top of Stefan's
> > pull request (commit ac9524d, qemu-iotests: filter QEMU monitor \r\n,
> > 2013-11-14).
> Sure, thanks, but Michael specifically asked for his pci branch,
> probably because it conflicts with his patch:
> "exec: memory radix tree page level compression"
> which is long (~50 patches) after "qemu-iotests: filter QEMU monitor \r\n"
Exactly.
Pls take a look, I think I fixed the issues with the rebase.
> Rebasing on top of the later resulted in 0 conflicts/patch unchanged...
>
> Thanks,
> Marcel
>
> >
> > Paolo
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-10 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-01 12:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec: separate sections and nodes per address space Marcel Apfelbaum
2013-12-02 13:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-09 18:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-10 11:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-10 12:37 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2013-12-10 12:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-10 12:50 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2013-12-10 16:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-12-11 9:19 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131210164839.GA5759@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=marcel.a@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).