From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36167)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <antonynpavlov@gmail.com>) id 1VrZC8-0003lc-Dk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:18:49 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <antonynpavlov@gmail.com>) id 1VrZC3-0006tr-3u
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:18:44 -0500
Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]:36690)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <antonynpavlov@gmail.com>) id 1VrZC2-0006s0-S8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:18:39 -0500
Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ec20so1783707lab.24
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 00:26:07 +0400
From: Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20131214002607.ffe2f4cc49f976b515ac4c0e@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Qemu-devel] a QOM Coding Conventions question
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Hi, Andreas!

Here is a quote from http://wiki.qemu.org/QOMConventions
   =20
>     a FooClass structure definition containing at least the parent class =
field:=20
>
>     typedef struct {
>         /*< private >*/
>         MyParentClass parent_class;
>         /*< public >*/
>
>         [any fields you need]
>     } FooClass;

What do the "< private >" and "< public >" comments exactly mean here?

--=A0
Best regards,
=A0 Antony Pavlov