From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsbAJ-0003fK-MH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:37:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsbAE-0002CR-KO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:37:07 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33628) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsbAE-0002Bs-3Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:37:02 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:06:36 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20131216123540.GB6582@grmbl.mre> References: <1386598213-8156-1-git-send-email-akong@redhat.com> <1386598213-8156-2-git-send-email-akong@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1386598213-8156-2-git-send-email-akong@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/2] rng-egd: improve egd backend performance List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Amos Kong Cc: varadgautam@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, anthony@codemonkey.ws On (Mon) 09 Dec 2013 [22:10:12], Amos Kong wrote: > Bugzilla: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1253563 > > We have a requests queue to cache the random data, but the second > will come in when the first request is returned, so we always > only have one items in the queue. It effects the performance. > > This patch changes the IOthread to fill a fixed buffer with > random data from egd socket, request_entropy() will return > data to virtio queue if buffer has available data. > > (test with a fast source, disguised egd socket) > # cat /dev/urandom | nc -l localhost 8003 > # qemu .. -chardev socket,host=localhost,port=8003,id=chr0 \ > -object rng-egd,chardev=chr0,id=rng0,buf_size=1024 \ > -device virtio-rng-pci,rng=rng0 First thing I can think of is the egd protocol has a length field in the header, and if that isn't properly filled, the results are bound to be erratic. I haven't been able to find a spec detailing the way egd API, perhaps Anthony knows how to best pass data to qemu via egd. Amit