From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws,
pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] test: QOM interface casting
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:22:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131220142211.1e2ac64b@nial.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52B43C64.6080408@suse.de>
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:47:32 +0100
Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 20.12.2013 12:08, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
> > ---
> > tests/Makefile | 3 +
> > tests/check-qom-interface.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 tests/check-qom-interface.c
>
> Apart from the style issues and typos that the two Peter's have pointed
> out, I'd like to point out that this is missing Signed-off-by and commit
> message. In particular, is this a test that should be committed
> alongside the interface cast fixes or anything else that I have queued?
> Or just to improve overall test coverage? Either way I'm in favor of
> having them.
Since interfaces are not widely used it's easy to break them, this adds
regression testing. It could go along with fixes you've queued.
>
> Concerning PMM's comment, don't we already have a qdev properties unit
> test from Eduardo where we might share QOM dependencies via some
> Makefile variable? Grouping the check-* tests also makes sense to me
> than just adding at the bottom.
>
> Anything in particular that you'd like comments on, this being an RFC?
Peters's and your comments are applied, I'll respin it as patch,
thanks for reviewing.
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-20 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-20 11:08 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] test: QOM interface casting Igor Mammedov
2013-12-20 11:24 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2013-12-20 12:01 ` Peter Maydell
2013-12-20 12:47 ` Andreas Färber
2013-12-20 13:22 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2013-12-21 10:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-12-21 14:56 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131220142211.1e2ac64b@nial.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).