From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34453) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0wLN-0007sE-PK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 11:51:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0wLH-0006Co-P4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 11:51:01 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0wLH-0006Ci-GV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 11:50:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 18:50:42 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20140108165042.GA17404@redhat.com> References: <1388269852-21198-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <1388269852-21198-8-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1388269852-21198-8-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] pc: ACPI: expose PRST IO range via _CRS List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Igor Mammedov Cc: hutao@cn.fujitsu.com, mjt@tls.msk.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, kraxel@redhat.com, anthony.perard@citrix.com, lersek@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 11:30:50PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > .. so OSPM could notice resource conflict if there is any. > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov > --- > hw/i386/acpi-dsdt-cpu-hotplug.dsl | 11 ++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-dsdt-cpu-hotplug.dsl b/hw/i386/acpi-dsdt-cpu-hotplug.dsl > index 1dfbb4f..869aa00 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-dsdt-cpu-hotplug.dsl > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-dsdt-cpu-hotplug.dsl > @@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ Scope(\_SB) { > Sleep(200) > } > > - OperationRegion(PRST, SystemIO, CPU_STATUS_BASE, 32) > +#define CPU_STATUS_LEN 32 > + OperationRegion(PRST, SystemIO, CPU_STATUS_BASE, CPU_STATUS_LEN) > Field(PRST, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve) { > PRS, 256 > } > @@ -89,4 +90,12 @@ Scope(\_SB) { > Increment(Local0) > } > } > + > + Device(PRES) { How about #define CPU_HOTPLUG_RESOURCE_DEVICE PRES or something? > + Name(_HID, "ACPI0004") Does this need to be marked as hidden with _STA? > + > + Name(_CRS, ResourceTemplate() { > + IO(Decode16, CPU_STATUS_BASE, CPU_STATUS_BASE, 0, CPU_STATUS_LEN) > + }) > + } > } > -- > 1.8.4.2