qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Noonan, Steven" <snoonan@amazon.com>
To: Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Steven Noonan <steven@uplinklabs.net>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] configure: add option to disable -fstack-protector flags
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 15:31:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140109233142.GB11226@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CF2E2F.4060005@comstyle.com>

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 06:18:07PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 09/01/14 5:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >Il 09/01/2014 22:55, Steven Noonan ha scritto:
> >>From: Steven Noonan <snoonan@amazon.com>
> >>
> >>The -fstack-protector flag family is useful for ensuring safety and for
> >>debugging, but has a performance impact. Here's a boot time comparison between
> >>a QEMU build of qemu-system-arm with and without the -fstack-protector-all
> >>flag:
> >>
> >>     # WITHOUT -fstack-protector-all
> >>     [root@localhost ~]# systemd-analyze
> >>     Startup finished in 1.744s (kernel) + 11.345s (initrd) + 47.164s (userspace) = 1min 255ms
> >>
> >>     # WITH -fstack-protector-all
> >>     [root@localhost ~]# systemd-analyze
> >>     Startup finished in 1.843s (kernel) + 12.262s (initrd) + 1min 3.480s (userspace) = 1min 17.587s
> >
> >Can you try -fstack-protector-strong?
> >
> >Probably the right thing to do is to pick in order
> >-fstack-protector-strong, -fstack-protector, and nothing.
> 
> +1
> 

I think there should still be an option to turn it off, but I agree that
there are probably better flags than -fstack-protector-all. I'll try
those out and post an update here probably later this evening.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-09 23:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-09 21:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] configure: add option to disable -fstack-protector flags Steven Noonan
2014-01-09 21:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] virtfs-proxy-helper.c: fix compile error Steven Noonan
2014-01-09 21:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Makefile: add bios-256k.bin to BLOBS Steven Noonan
2014-01-09 23:27   ` Peter Maydell
2014-01-09 23:30     ` Noonan, Steven
2014-01-10  9:12       ` Markus Armbruster
2014-01-09 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] configure: add option to disable -fstack-protector flags Peter Maydell
2014-01-09 22:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-09 23:18   ` Brad Smith
2014-01-09 23:31     ` Noonan, Steven [this message]
2014-01-11  2:36     ` Noonan, Steven
2014-01-11  7:46       ` Stefan Weil
2014-01-13 11:53         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-13 20:00           ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] " Steven Noonan
2014-01-13 20:27             ` Stefan Weil
2014-01-13 20:38               ` Noonan, Steven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140109233142.GB11226@amazon.com \
    --to=snoonan@amazon.com \
    --cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
    --cc=brad@comstyle.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=steven@uplinklabs.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).