From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56047)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <william@gandi.net>) id 1W37y2-0005qd-DK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:40:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <william@gandi.net>) id 1W37xu-0003CC-By
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:39:58 -0500
Received: from mail4.gandi.net ([217.70.183.210]:50485)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <william@gandi.net>) id 1W37xu-0003C1-4c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:39:50 -0500
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 18:40:49 +0100
From: William Dauchy <william@gandi.net>
Message-ID: <20140114174049.GN26311@gandi.net>
References: <1389719733-7689-1-git-send-email-william@gandi.net>
	<52D5748F.2020600@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="U6leaJ20qZQc29iB"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52D5748F.2020600@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tap: add the possibility to specify a tap
	prefix
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>, William Dauchy <william@gandi.net>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>


--U6leaJ20qZQc29iB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Paolo,

Thanks for your quick reply.

On Jan14 18:31, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I think this was nacked already in the past.  You would need to
> implement some kind of ACL system like the one that is in place for
> bridges.  Without it, for example, you could hijack existing iptables rul=
es.

I don't get it; this does not change anything to the existing but
permits to change the default "tap" string prefix.

Am I missing something?

--=20
William

--U6leaJ20qZQc29iB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlLVdqEACgkQ1I6eqOUidQGQTACdEJWKdV77OiDo8EaFW44hoHLf
xHsAn3ENplXCJVIgX7um+Ci4ROfR4Eso
=lrla
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--U6leaJ20qZQc29iB--