Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] qcow2: check for NULL l2meta

[Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>]

Am 20.01.2014 um 04:04 hat Hu Tao geschrieben:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 05:18:05PM +0100, Max Reitz wrote:
> > On 30.12.2013 06:29, Hu Tao wrote:
> > >In case of do preallocating metadata with a large cluster size,
> > >qcow2_alloc_cluster_offset() can allocate nothing and returns
> > >a NULL l2meta. This patch checks for it and link2 l2 with only
> > >valid l2meta.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > >---
> > >  block/qcow2.c | 14 ++++++++------
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > >diff --git a/block/qcow2.c b/block/qcow2.c
> > >index 46860d5..380c240 100644
> > >--- a/block/qcow2.c
> > >+++ b/block/qcow2.c
> > >@@ -1399,18 +1399,20 @@ static int preallocate(BlockDriverState *bs)
> > >      offset = 0;
> > >      while (nb_sectors) {
> > >-        num = MIN(nb_sectors, INT_MAX >> 9);
> > >+        num = MIN(nb_sectors, INT_MAX >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS);
> > 
> > Well, if you're already adjusting this here, you could also replace
> > the other occurrences of 9 and 512 in this function. ;-)
> > 
> > >          ret = qcow2_alloc_cluster_offset(bs, offset, &num,
> > >                                           &host_offset, &meta);
> > >          if (ret < 0) {
> > >              return ret;
> > >          }
> > >-        ret = qcow2_alloc_cluster_link_l2(bs, meta);
> > >-        if (ret < 0) {
> > >-            qcow2_free_any_clusters(bs, meta->alloc_offset, meta->nb_clusters,
> > >-                                    QCOW2_DISCARD_NEVER);
> > >-            return ret;
> > >+        if (meta) {
> > >+            ret = qcow2_alloc_cluster_link_l2(bs, meta);
> > >+            if (ret < 0) {
> > >+                qcow2_free_any_clusters(bs, meta->alloc_offset,
> > >+                                        meta->nb_clusters, QCOW2_DISCARD_NEVER);
> > >+                return ret;
> > >+            }
> > >          }
> > >          /* There are no dependent requests, but we need to remove our request
> > 
> > But this doesn't make this patch wrong, so:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> 
> Max,
> 
> Thanks for all of you comments!

The series looks good in general, but I think the comments are worth
addressing before we merge it. I would also love to see an qemu-iotests
case that tests the cases that would previously crash.

Once you post a new version that addresses these points, I'll merge it.

Kevin