From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5yjR-0004Ot-0n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:24:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5yjN-0006L2-8o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:24:40 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41967) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5yjN-0006Kq-0o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:24:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:28:54 +0000 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Message-ID: <20140122122854.GR9434@redhat.com> References: <1390390561-14901-1-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Describe flaws in qcow/qcow2 encryption in the docs Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Kevin Wolf , Paolo Bonzini , QEMU Developers , Stefan Hajnoczi On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:49:21AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 22 January 2014 11:36, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Recommend against any use of QCow/QCow2 encryption, directing > > users to dm-crypt / LUKS which can meet modern cryptography > > best practices. > > Couple of minor typo nits I spotted: Thanks Peter, sending a v2. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|