From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32907)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael@walle.cc>) id 1W9hcV-0001D1-2x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:56:59 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael@walle.cc>) id 1W9hcQ-0002PH-6q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:56:55 -0500
Received: from ssl.serverraum.org ([88.198.40.39]:60146)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael@walle.cc>) id 1W9hcQ-0002PD-1H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:56:50 -0500
From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:56:47 +0100
References: <1390246471-25167-1-git-send-email-michael@walle.cc>
	<CAFEAcA8xdzOWuzY2Dohos9zpSmcRoYFHRu2rS1jeYT5DQKrV1w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8xdzOWuzY2Dohos9zpSmcRoYFHRu2rS1jeYT5DQKrV1w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201402012156.48027.michael@walle.cc>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 00/12] target-lm32 updates
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>

Am Samstag, 1. Februar 2014, 19:21:28 schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 20 January 2014 19:34, Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
> > Hi Anthony,
> > 
> > this is a pull request for various updates and fixes for the
> > LatticeMico32 target.
> > 
> > Please pull.
> 
> Apologies for doing a review pass on this rather than pulling it.
> However given that most of the patches didn't have reviewed-by
> tags I gave them a quick eyeball and felt there were enough minor
> issues  there that I would rather err on the side of caution. If you
> address the issues I'll review a respin of this patch series and I'm
> happy to apply a pull request once the patches have got review.
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM

no problem and thanks for the review. i'm happy to post a cleaned up v5 ;)

-michael