From: "Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>
To: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Cc: "Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>,
kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
"Bharata B Rao" <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] block: gluster - code movements, state storage changes
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:49:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140210174911.GA5205@irqsave.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140207155733.GH29994@localhost.localdomain>
Le Friday 07 Feb 2014 à 10:57:33 (-0500), Jeff Cody a écrit :
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:57:35PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 03:22:29PM +0100, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > > Le Friday 07 Feb 2014 à 09:14:50 (+0530), Bharata B Rao a écrit :
> > > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:25:36PM +0100, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > > > > Le Tuesday 04 Feb 2014 à 14:26:58 (-0500), Jeff Cody a écrit :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +static void qemu_gluster_parse_flags(int bdrv_flags, int *open_flags)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + assert(open_flags != NULL);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + *open_flags |= O_BINARY;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (bdrv_flags & BDRV_O_RDWR) {
> > > > > > + *open_flags |= O_RDWR;
> > > > > > + } else {
> > > > > > + *open_flags |= O_RDONLY;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if ((bdrv_flags & BDRV_O_NOCACHE)) {
> > > > > > + *open_flags |= O_DIRECT;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +}
> > > > >
> > > > > I saw the enable-O_SYNC option here.
> > > > > http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Translators/performance
> > > > > Why the gluster driver does not allow to enable O_SYNC ?
> > > >
> > > > I am not aware of any option in QEMU (like cache= etc) that will force
> > > > block driver (like gluster) to use O_SYNC. Do other drivers use O_SYNC ?
> > >
> > > [,cache=writethrough|writeback|none|directsync|unsafe][
> > >
> > > I think writethough is O_SYNC and directsync is O_DIRECT|O_SYNC.
> >
> > May be I am missing something, but I checked the flags with which
> > raw protocol driver opens the file image for different cache options
> > and this is what I found by looking at open flags in util/osdep.c:qemu_open()
> >
> > (Ignoring O_CLOEXEC which is common for all the cases)
> >
> > writethrough 02 O_RDWR
> > writeback 02 O_RDWR
> > none 040002 O_DIRECT|O_RDWR
> > directsync 040002 O_DIRECT|O_RDWR
> > unsafe 02 O_RDWR
> >
> > I do see the below comment in block/raw-posix.c:raw_parse_flags()
> >
> > /* Use O_DSYNC for write-through caching, no flags for write-back caching,
> > * and O_DIRECT for no caching. */
> > if ((bdrv_flags & BDRV_O_NOCACHE)) {
> > *open_flags |= O_DIRECT;
> > }
> >
> > But I don't see the driver actually setting O_DSYNC anywhere.
> >
>
> You are not mistaken. For qemu writethrough cache (the default), it
> is not via O_SYNC/DSYNC directly in the protocol drivers, but
> essentially done inside block.c (e.g., bdrv_flush()).
>
>
Hmm sorry for spreading fud. It was not intentional.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-10 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-04 19:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] block: add support for gluster reopen Jeff Cody
2014-02-04 19:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] block: gluster - code movements, state storage changes Jeff Cody
2014-02-05 19:25 ` Benoît Canet
2014-02-07 3:44 ` Bharata B Rao
2014-02-07 14:22 ` Benoît Canet
2014-02-07 15:27 ` Bharata B Rao
2014-02-07 15:57 ` Jeff Cody
2014-02-10 17:49 ` Benoît Canet [this message]
2014-02-07 15:59 ` Benoît Canet
2014-02-14 14:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-02-14 14:44 ` Jeff Cody
2014-02-14 14:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-02-14 14:41 ` Jeff Cody
2014-02-14 15:38 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-02-14 16:20 ` Jeff Cody
2014-02-14 16:28 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-02-04 19:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] block: gluster - add reopen support Jeff Cody
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140210174911.GA5205@irqsave.net \
--to=benoit.canet@irqsave.net \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).