From: "Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: "Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>,
kwolf@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [FIX V2] block: Fix device snapshots broken by the block filter snapshots patchset.
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 20:49:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140212194918.GC4225@irqsave.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140211081217.GB12675@T430.nay.redhat.com>
The Tuesday 11 Feb 2014 à 16:12:17 (+0800), Fam Zheng wrote :
> On Mon, 02/10 22:49, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > Take into account the fact that a block filter like quorum will be in bs->file
> > while a regular block driver device is really on the top level.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Canet <benoit@irqsave.net>
> > ---
> > block.c | 14 ++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> > index 07ac50a..d04f535 100644
> > --- a/block.c
> > +++ b/block.c
> > @@ -5400,14 +5400,16 @@ bool bdrv_is_first_non_filter(BlockDriverState *candidate)
> >
> > /* walk down the bs forest recursively */
> > QTAILQ_FOREACH(bs, &bdrv_states, device_list) {
> > - bool perm;
> > -
> > - if (!bs->file) {
> > - continue;
> > + bool perm = false;
> > +
> > + if (bs->file &&
> > + bs->file->drv &&
> > + bs->file->drv->authorizations[BS_IS_A_FILTER]) {
> > + perm = bdrv_recurse_is_first_non_filter(bs->file, candidate);
> > + } else if (bs == candidate) {
> > + perm = true;
> > }
> >
> > - perm = bdrv_recurse_is_first_non_filter(bs->file, candidate);
> > -
> > /* candidate is the first non filter */
> > if (perm) {
> > return true;
>
> With this change, if the top level driver has ->file, its implementation of
> .bdrv_recurse_is_first_non_filter() is skipped and bs->file is the start point.
>
> So we have an implication that single child block drivers (that has ->file)
> doesn't need to, and shouldn't implement this operation, as commentted above
> bdrv_generic_is_first_non_filter.
>
> Tested that this patch fixes the external snapshot problem, but didn't test
> the "quorum as bs->file case".
>
> Thanks,
>
> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
After extensive testing of all type of quorum instanciations and snapshots I
discovered that we are not done yet with this issue.
When instantiating quorum from the command line the quorum driver is in
bs->file->drv.
When using QMP's blockdev_add at once or by using references the quorum driver
is in bs->drv.
As a result this patch work in half the cases: regular file and command line
quorum but not when quorum is instantiated via QMP.
I don't understand why the block layer have this irregular behavior regarding
quorum instantiation.
What would be the best way to fix this ?
Best regards
Benoît
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-12 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-10 21:49 [Qemu-devel] [FIX V2] Fix broken external snapshots Benoît Canet
2014-02-10 21:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [FIX V2] block: Fix device snapshots broken by the block filter snapshots patchset Benoît Canet
2014-02-11 8:12 ` Fam Zheng
2014-02-12 19:49 ` Benoît Canet [this message]
2014-02-12 21:43 ` Benoît Canet
2014-02-13 1:42 ` Benoît Canet
2014-02-13 8:27 ` Kevin Wolf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-13 1:51 [Qemu-devel] [FIX V2] repair snapshots Benoît Canet
2014-02-13 1:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [FIX V2] block: Fix device snapshots broken by the block filter snapshots patchset Benoît Canet
2014-02-13 8:33 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-02-13 8:44 ` Benoît Canet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140212194918.GC4225@irqsave.net \
--to=benoit.canet@irqsave.net \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).