From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] block: optimize zero writes with bdrv_write_zeroes
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:07:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140224120712.GG3775@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530B323C.5050609@redhat.com>
Am 24.02.2014 um 12:51 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> Il 24/02/2014 12:33, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
> >> This is (or should be) bdrv_co_write_zeroes without BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP.
> >
> >But IIUC bdrv_co_write_zeroes without BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP doesn't require
> >cluster allocation if it's allocated yet, which is a bit different.
>
> Yeah, that's why I wrote "or should be". Those are the intended
> semantics of bdrv_co_write_zeroes without BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP: always
> allocate a cluster that will read as zeroes (allocating even if it
> does not necessarily write the zeroes).
Which would mean that there is no way to say "give me zeroes, and do it
in the cheapest way possible". Because that would be to leave the
allocation status as it is and just toggle the zero bit.
> For legacy reasons it may not be exactly what is implemented. I
> asked Kevin a couple of weeks ago and he sent a patch, but even he
> wasn't sure of what qcow2 was doing util he looked at the code. :)
Even with my patch, it doesn't actually allocate the cluster, it just
sets the flag.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-22 13:00 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] block: optimize zero writes with bdrv_write_zeroes Peter Lieven
2014-02-22 16:45 ` Fam Zheng
2014-02-23 19:10 ` Peter Lieven
2014-02-24 1:01 ` Fam Zheng
2014-02-24 10:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-24 11:33 ` Fam Zheng
2014-02-24 11:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-24 12:04 ` Fam Zheng
2014-02-24 12:07 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2014-02-24 12:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-24 12:22 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-02-24 10:11 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-02-24 10:26 ` Peter Lieven
2014-02-24 10:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-24 11:50 ` Peter Lieven
2014-02-24 13:01 ` Peter Lieven
2014-02-25 13:41 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-02-25 17:03 ` Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140224120712.GG3775@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).