From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIzDP-0007AA-Ri for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 06:33:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIzDL-0005bb-38 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 06:33:23 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39326) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIzDK-0005bT-S9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 06:33:19 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:03:12 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20140227113312.GA30957@grmbl.mre> References: <155481d240779c5d25f8195a406d57db613507bc.1393407651.git.amit.shah@redhat.com> <20140227101815.GC30387@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140227101815.GC30387@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] block: use /var/tmp instead of /tmp for -snapshot List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu list , Stefan Hajnoczi On (Thu) 27 Feb 2014 [11:18:15], Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 03:12:37PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > If TMPDIR is not specified, the default was to use /tmp for the working > > copy of the block devices. Update this to /var/tmp instead, so systems > > using tmp-on-tmpfs don't end up inadvertently using RAM for the block > > device. > > > > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah > > --- > > block.c | 5 +++-- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Was expecting someone to argue against this because a path change is > always controversial :-). But I think this makes sense and no one is > protesting.... You mean I can relax my crossed fingers now? > Thanks, applied to my block tree: > https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/block Thanks! Amit