qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	armbru@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, aliguori@amazon.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] tests: Fix possible deadlock in qtest initialization
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 20:13:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140310191301.GB12263@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394464877.3981.21.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 05:21:17PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 16:02 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:12:12PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > 'socket_accept' waits for Qemu to init its unix socket.
> > > If Qemu encounters an error during command line parsing,
> > > it can exit before initializing the communication channel.
> > > It gets worse as the make check-qtest-* gets stuck without
> > > notifying which test exactly has problems, so debugging can
> > > be a challenge.
> > > 
> > > The solution has two parts:
> > >  - Use a timeout for the socket.
> > >  - Expose a qtest_state_valid that checks that the connections
> > >    with Qemu are OK.
> > 
> > See below why I think qtest_state_valid() is unnecessary as a libqtest.h
> > API.
> > 
> > > Asserting qtest_state_valid in each test after qtest_init
> > > is a must, as we need to trace which test failed.
> > 
> > Inability to tell which qtest failed is a Makefile problem.  The
> > solution is not to move all asserts to the outer-most level just so the
> > error message includes the test name.
> > 
> > Either we need to invoke gtester separately for each test - that way the
> > Makefile can print "TEST <name>" for each binary.  Or maybe gtester has
> > options for formatting output better.
> Hi Stefan,
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> I am more concerned of PATCH 1/2, because it is a blocker for another series I am working on.
> I can resend only the first one which adds socket timeout and leaves the original assert.
> Would you be OK with this?

Yes, that sounds fine.  I posted comments on Patch 1 about ensuring the sockets
are unlinked before we fail (to prevent leaking the UNIX domain socket nodes in
the file system) - it does involve moving the assert to qtest_init().

> Now regarding the issue you brought up (less important):
> - Tweaking the Makefile to run each qtest separately and not all tests per arch
>   is a viable solution, however I am not familiar with the makefile magic and
>   it will take me a lot of time to get into it.

The following produces per-test output.  This means you'll know which test failed:

diff --git a/tests/Makefile b/tests/Makefile
index b17d41e..a8405c8 100644
--- a/tests/Makefile
+++ b/tests/Makefile
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ check-help:
        @echo "changed with variable GTESTER_OPTIONS."
 
 SPEED = quick
-GTESTER_OPTIONS = -k $(if $(V),--verbose,-q)
+GTESTER_OPTIONS = -k #$(if $(V),--verbose,-q)
 GCOV_OPTIONS = -n $(if $(V),-f,)
 
 # gtester tests, possibly with verbose output

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-10 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-10 12:12 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] tests: Fix possible deadlock in qtest initialization Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-10 12:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tests/libqtest: " Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-10 19:02   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-03-12  9:42   ` Markus Armbruster
2014-03-12  9:54     ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-10 12:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tests: check that qtest state is valid before starting the test Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-10 15:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] tests: Fix possible deadlock in qtest initialization Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-03-10 15:21   ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-10 19:13     ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2014-03-11 10:11       ` Marcel Apfelbaum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140310191301.GB12263@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcel.a@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).