From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: "Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
stefanha@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Rewrite block filter snapshot authorization mechanism
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 19:19:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140311181918.GA17693@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393870294-19351-1-git-send-email-benoit.canet@irqsave.net>
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 07:11:33PM +0100, Benoît Canet wrote:
> Rewrite the snapshot authorization mechanism for block filter as suggested by
> Paolo.
>
> run testsuite
>
> and
>
> Tested BlockBackend snapshots
> Tested quorum snapshot
> Tested that snapshot below or above the active qcow2 file are not authorized
>
> Benoît Canet (1):
> block: Rewrite the snapshot authorization mechanism for block filters.
>
> block.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> block/blkverify.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> block/quorum.c | 3 +--
> include/block/block.h | 9 ---------
> include/block/block_int.h | 8 ++++----
> 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
Thanks, applied to my block tree and fixed up commit description to
mention semantic change in blkverify:
https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/block
Stefan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-11 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-03 18:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Rewrite block filter snapshot authorization mechanism Benoît Canet
2014-03-03 18:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Rewrite the snapshot authorization mechanism for block filters Benoît Canet
2014-03-03 18:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-03 19:13 ` Benoît Canet
2014-03-03 21:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-10 18:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Rewrite block filter snapshot authorization mechanism Benoît Canet
2014-03-11 18:19 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140311181918.GA17693@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=benoit.canet@irqsave.net \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).