From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPTtT-00007v-Bk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 05:31:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPTtN-00061H-Bs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 05:31:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPTtN-00061C-4A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 05:31:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:31:14 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20140317093114.GA5392@noname.str.redhat.com> References: <5322F415.4070409@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5322F415.4070409@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Coverity scan successes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: mattjd@gmail.com, Mark Cave-Ayland , qemu-devel Hi Paolo, Am 14.03.2014 um 13:20 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: > Of course, the defect density varies across subsystems: > > ratio # defects > SLIRP 2.86 20 > 9pfs/virtio-9p 1.69 16 > Bluetooth 1.31 6 > NBD 1.31 2 > User-mode emulation 0.84 25 > Block layer 0.66 25 How would I get access to the Coverity results? I feel the block layer is scoring a bit too high here... :-) Kevin