From: Leandro Dorileo <l@dorileo.org>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: "Wenchao Xia" <wenchaoqemu@gmail.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Anthony Liguori" <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
"Chunyan Liu" <cyliu@suse.com>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QemuOpt: add unit tests
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:24:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140317162436.GA24576@dorilex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53271FCC.6010504@redhat.com>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:16:12AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/16/2014 03:18 PM, Leandro Dorileo wrote:
> > Cover basic aspects and API usage for QemuOpt. The current implementation
> > covers the API's planed to be changed by Chunyan Liu in his QEMUOptionParameter
>
> s/planed/planned/
>
> > replacement/cleanup job.
> >
> > Other APIs should be covered in future improvements.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leandro Dorileo <l@dorileo.org>
> > ---
> > tests/Makefile | 3 +
> > tests/test-qemu-opts.c | 309 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 312 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 tests/test-qemu-opts.c
> >
>
> > +
> > +static void test_find_unknown_opts(void)
> > +{
> > + QemuOptsList *list;
> > +
> > + register_opts();
> > +
> > + /** should not return anything, we don't known "unknown" option */
>
> s/known/have an/
ok.
>
> Here, and throughout the file: /** */ comments are special to doc
> markup, and should only be needed prior to declaring a function. Within
> a function body, use the simpler /* */ comment.
>
> > +static void test_qemu_find_opts(void)
> > +{
> > + QemuOptsList *list;
> > +
> > + register_opts();
> > +
> > + /** we have an rtc option, should return it */
> > + list = qemu_find_opts("opts_list_01");
> > + g_assert(list != NULL);
>
> Should you do any further testing on the contents of the returned list?
ok. I'll see the API.
>
> > +static void test_qemu_opt_get(void)
> > +{
>
> > + /** now we have set str2, should know about it */
> > + opt = qemu_opt_get(opts, "str2");
> > + g_assert(opt != NULL && !strcmp(opt, "value"));
>
> Isn't g_assert_cmpstr nicer for this, as in:
>
> g_assert_cmpstr(opt, ==, "value");
Yep, sure, I wasn't awere of g_assert_cmpstr, thanks.
>
> > +static void test_qemu_opt_get_size(void)
> > +{
> > + QemuOptsList *list;
>
> > +
> > + qemu_opts_absorb_qdict(opts, dict, &local_err);
> > + g_assert(local_err == NULL);
>
> shorter as:
>
> qemu_opts_absorb_qdict(opts, dict, &error_abort);
I see.
>
> Overall, I like where this is headed; looking forward to v2.
>
Thanks for reviewing...
--
Leandro Dorileo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-17 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-16 21:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QemuOpt: add unit tests Leandro Dorileo
2014-03-17 16:16 ` Eric Blake
2014-03-17 16:24 ` Leandro Dorileo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140317162436.GA24576@dorilex \
--to=l@dorileo.org \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=cyliu@suse.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=wenchaoqemu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).