From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51109) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQXrt-0008JS-4Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 03:58:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQXrk-00044Y-Mr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 03:58:25 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]:40057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQXrk-00044K-Fj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 03:58:16 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id w62so297442wes.28 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:58:11 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20140320075811.GA28673@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> References: <1384700688-30377-1-git-send-email-samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> <1392124097-10618-1-git-send-email-samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> <53200C56.6040300@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53200C56.6040300@siemens.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 00/16] slirp: Adding IPv6 support to Qemu -net user mode List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Samuel Thibault , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Guillaume Subiron On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 08:27:18AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2014-02-11 14:08, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This is a respin of IPv6 in Qemu -net user mode. > > > > These patches add ICMPv6, NDP, and make UDP and TCP compatible with > > IPv6. We have made some refactoring to make current code compatible with > > IPv6. > > > > Some patches, like 2 and 13, can be reviewed using > > "interdiff -w /dev/null patchfile" > > to get rid of the indentation. > > The alternative is to split reindention from refactoring patches. > > > > > Difference with version 2 is: > > - The default IP range has been made fec0::/64 instead of fc00::/64 > > > > This is very valuable work. Unfortunately, I'm lacking time to review or > even test this ATM. If someone else could, that would be great. I also feel a little sad to see this major feature languish but don't have much time at the moment. My suggestion is to split all the preparation and cleanups into a smaller patch series that can be applied easily. It will make the real IPv6 series smaller and hopefully more amenable to review. Stefan