From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49877) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTKCn-0007vW-Fx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 19:59:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTKCh-0006Se-HA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 19:59:29 -0400 Received: from smtp1.onthe.net.au ([203.22.196.249]:46471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTKCh-0006S9-7K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 19:59:23 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:59:18 +1100 From: Chris Dunlop Message-ID: <20140327235918.GA7689@onthe.net.au> References: <20140327225242.GA5005@onthe.net.au> <5334B44E.4080300@beyond.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5334B44E.4080300@beyond.pl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Unresponsive linux guest once migrated List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marcin =?utf-8?Q?Gibu=C5=82a?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:29:18AM +0100, Marcin Gibu=C5=82a wrote: > W dniu 2014-03-27 23:52, Chris Dunlop pisze: >> Hi, >> >> I have a problem where I migrate a linux guest VM, and on the >> receiving side the guest goes to 100% cpu as seen by the host, and >> the guest itself is unresponsive, e.g. not responding to ping etc. >> The only way out I've found is to destroy the guest. >> >> This seems to only happen if the guest has been idle for an extended >> period (e.g. overnight). I've migrated the guest 100 times in a row >> without any problems when the guest has been used "a little" (e.g. >> logging in and looking around, it's not doing anything normally). >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I've seen very similar problem on our installation. Have you tried to > run with kvm-clock explicitly disabled (either via no-kvmclock in > guest kernel or with -kvm-clock in qemu) ? No, I haven't tried it yet (I've confirmed kvm-clock is currently being used). I'll have a look at it. Did it help your issue? Thanks, Chris