From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>,
Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Error propagation in generated visitors and command marshallers
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:10:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140411101033.GF4038@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874n20nubr.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Am 11.04.2014 um 10:28 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Am 09.04.2014 um 17:48 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> >> I stumbled over this while trying to purge error_is_set() from the code.
> >>
> >>
> >> Here's how we commonly use the Error API:
> >>
> >> Error *err = NULL;
> >>
> >> foo(arg, &err)
> >> if (err) {
> >> goto out;
> >> }
> >> bar(arg, &err)
> >> if (err) {
> >> goto out;
> >> }
> >>
> >> This ensures that err is null on entry, both for foo() and for bar().
> >> Many functions rely on that, like this:
> >>
> >> void foo(ArgType arg, Error **errp)
> >> {
> >> if (frobnicate(arg) < 0) {
> >> error_setg(errp, "Can't frobnicate");
> >> // This asserts errp != NULL
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >> Here's how some of our visitor code uses the Error API (for real code,
> >> check out generated qmp-marshal.c):
> >>
> >> Error *err = NULL;
> >> QmpInputVisitor *mi = qmp_input_visitor_new_strict(QOBJECT(args));
> >> Visitor *v = qmp_input_get_visitor(mi);
> >> char *foo = NULL;
> >> char *bar = NULL;
> >>
> >> visit_type_str(v, &foo, "foo", &err);
> >> visit_type_str(v, &bar, "bar", &err);
> >> if (err) {
> >> goto out;
> >> }
> >>
> >> Unlike above, this may pass a non-null errp to the second
> >> visit_type_str(), namely when the first one fails.
> >>
> >> The visitor functions guard against that, like this:
> >>
> >> void visit_type_str(Visitor *v, char **obj, const char *name, Error **errp)
> >> {
> >> if (!error_is_set(errp)) {
> >> v->type_str(v, obj, name, errp);
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> As discussed before, error_is_set() is almost almost wrong, fragile or
> >> unclean. What if errp is null? Then we fail to stop visiting after an
> >> error.
> >>
> >> The function could be improved like this:
> >>
> >> void visit_type_str(Visitor *v, char **obj, const char *name, Error **errp)
> >> {
> >> assert(errp);
> >> if (!*errp) {
> >> v->type_str(v, obj, name, errp);
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >> But: is it a good idea to have both patterns in the code? Should we
> >> perhaps use the common pattern for visiting, too? Like this:
> >>
> >> visit_type_str(v, &foo, "foo", &err);
> >> if (err) {
> >> goto out;
> >> }
> >> visit_type_str(v, &bar, "bar", &err);
> >> if (err) {
> >> goto out;
> >> }
> >>
> >> Then we can assume *errp is clear on function entry, like this:
> >>
> >> void visit_type_str(Visitor *v, char **obj, const char *name, Error **errp)
> >> {
> >> v->type_str(v, obj, name, errp);
> >> }
> >>
> >> Should execute roughly the same number of conditional branches.
> >>
> >> Tedious repetition of "if (err) goto out" in the caller, but that's what
> >> we do elsewhere, and unlike elsewhere, these one's are generated.
> >>
> >> Opinions?
> >
> > I agree, use the same style as everywhere else.
> >
> > The pattern in the generated visitor that I find more annoying, though,
> > is that it has a lot of code like:
> >
> > if (!error_is_set(errp)) {
> > /* long block of code here */
> > }
> >
> > And I believe there are even cases where this nests.
>
> I also find "if (error) bail_out" generally more readable than "if
> (!error) do_more_work". More so when nested.
>
> I'll see what I can do about it in the generator scripts.
>
> > There are also
> > error_propagate() calls that can (and do in the common case) propagate
> > NULL, this way selecting the first error, if any, but not stopping on
> > the first error. I always found it confusing to read that code.
>
> Can you point me to an instance in the generated code?
It's more or less everywhere. The pattern for structs is something like
this:
void visit_struct(..., Error *errp)
{
if (!error_is_set(errp)) {
Error *err = NULL;
visit_start_struct(..., &err);
if (!err) {
/* These functions set errors if none is set yet */
do_foo(&err);
do_bar(&err);
do_baz(&err);
}
/* err is NULL here for success */
error_propagate(errp, err);
}
}
But you can find similar code for lists and unions. There's also code
like this:
/* err is NULL here for success */
error_propagate(errp, err);
err = NULL;
And then err can be assigned new errors, but the subsequent
error_propagate() will simply free the Error objects again.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-11 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-09 15:48 [Qemu-devel] Error propagation in generated visitors and command marshallers Markus Armbruster
2014-04-09 16:34 ` Eric Blake
2014-04-09 16:36 ` Anthony Liguori
2014-04-11 8:20 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-04-09 17:23 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2014-04-11 8:24 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-04-11 8:37 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2014-04-10 11:24 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-04-11 8:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-04-11 10:10 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2014-04-11 11:59 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2014-04-11 13:41 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-04-11 22:46 ` Peter Crosthwaite
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140411101033.GF4038@noname.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=crobinso@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).