From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/raw-posix: Fall back to SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 13:49:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140506114958.GE15810@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399320099-32457-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com>
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:01:39PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> The current version of raw-posix always uses ioctl(FS_IOC_FIEMAP) if
> FIEMAP is available; lseek with SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA are not even
> compiled in in this case. However, there may be implementations which
> support the latter but not the former (e.g., NFSv4.2). In this case,
> raw-posix should fall back to lseek with SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA if FIEMAP
> does not work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> ---
> As Linux does not yet implement NFSv4.2 (I don't even know whether the
> specification is complete), I have no way of testing whether this
> actually works for the proposed case. But as it doesn't break any of the
> existing test cases, it should be fine.
> ---
> block/raw-posix.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/raw-posix.c b/block/raw-posix.c
> index 3ce026d..e523633 100644
> --- a/block/raw-posix.c
> +++ b/block/raw-posix.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,9 @@ typedef struct BDRVRawState {
> bool has_discard:1;
> bool has_write_zeroes:1;
> bool discard_zeroes:1;
> +#if defined CONFIG_FIEMAP && defined SEEK_HOLE && defined SEEK_DATA
> + bool use_seek_hole_data;
> +#endif
> } BDRVRawState;
>
> typedef struct BDRVRawReopenState {
> @@ -1291,6 +1294,7 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn raw_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
> int64_t sector_num,
> int nb_sectors, int *pnum)
> {
> + BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
> off_t start, data, hole;
> int64_t ret;
>
> @@ -1303,22 +1307,31 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn raw_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
> ret = BDRV_BLOCK_DATA | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | start;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_FIEMAP
> -
> - BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
> struct {
> struct fiemap fm;
> struct fiemap_extent fe;
> } f;
>
> +#if defined SEEK_HOLE && defined SEEK_DATA
> + if (s->use_seek_hole_data) {
> + goto try_seek_hole_data;
> + }
> +#endif
This is becoming hard to read due to the ifdefs and their relationships.
A minor simplification is to change the bool field:
#if defined CONFIG_FIEMAP
bool use_fiemap;
#endif
...
#if defined CONFIG_FIEMAP
if (s->use_fiemap) {
...try fiemap...
}
#endif /* CONFIG_FIEMAP */
use_fiemap is not dependent on SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA. That reduces the
amount of ifdefs needed.
A bigger cleanup is extracting the FIEMAP and SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA
implementations into their own static functions. Then
raw_co_get_block_status() becomes simpler and doesn't need ifdefs:
ret = try_fiemap(...);
if (ret < 0) {
ret = try_seekhole(...);
}
if (ret < 0) {
...report every block allocated by default....
}
In other words, let normal C control flow describe the relationships
between these code paths. Use ifdef only to nop out try_fiemap() and
try_seekhole().
What do you think?
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-06 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-05 20:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/raw-posix: Fall back to SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA Max Reitz
2014-05-06 11:49 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2014-05-06 12:27 ` Eric Blake
2014-05-06 17:46 ` Max Reitz
2014-05-06 17:55 ` Eric Blake
2014-05-06 17:45 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140506114958.GE15810@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).