From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WhxlJ-0005FQ-2b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 05:03:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WhxlC-0001OW-SV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 05:03:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WhxlC-0001OK-LC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 05:03:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 12:02:21 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20140507090221.GA17706@redhat.com> References: <1396283195-6819-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <5339E521.40906@suse.de> <20140402155554.GA11987@redhat.com> <5369E8EE.1080603@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5369E8EE.1080603@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.0 0/7] SMBus and tmp105 fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:03:58AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 02/04/2014 17:55, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > >>>> > smbus: allow returning an error from reads > >>>> > smbus: return -1 if nothing found at the given address > >>>> > pm_smbus: correctly report unclaimed cycles > >>> > >>> I've reviewed these and they look sane and safe for 2.0. > >>> mst, could you have a second look as PC maintainer and take them? > >I'd rather delay to 2.1. > >It's not a regression is it? > > > > Ping? > > Paolo Applied, thanks!