From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Cc: famz@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com,
stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3] block: optimize zero writes with bdrv_write_zeroes
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 09:44:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140508074424.GB4034@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536A592C.6090102@kamp.de>
Am 07.05.2014 um 18:02 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
> On 07.05.2014 17:45, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >On 07.05.2014 17:38, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>Am 07.05.2014 um 17:26 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
> >>>On 07.05.2014 17:19, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>>>Am 07.05.2014 um 16:26 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
> >>>>>On 07.05.2014 04:52, Eric Blake wrote:
> >>>>>>On 05/06/2014 06:23 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>>>>>>this patch tries to optimize zero write requests
> >>>>>>>by automatically using bdrv_write_zeroes if it is
> >>>>>>>supported by the format.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>This significantly speeds up file system initialization and
> >>>>>>>should speed zero write test used to test backend storage
> >>>>>>>performance.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
> >>>>>>>---
> >>>>>>>v2->v3: - moved parameter parsing to blockdev_init
> >>>>>>> - added per device detect_zeroes status to
> >>>>>>> hmp (info block -v) and qmp (query-block) [Eric]
> >>>>>>> - added support to enable detect-zeroes also
> >>>>>>> for hot added devices [Eric]
> >>>>>>> - added missing entry to qemu_common_drive_opts
> >>>>>>> - fixed description of qemu_iovec_is_zero [Fam]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>+static BdrvDetectZeroes parse_detect_zeroes(const char *buf, Error **errp)
> >>>>>>>+{
> >>>>>>>+ if (!buf || !strcmp(buf, "off")) {
> >>>>>>>+ return BDRV_DETECT_ZEROES_OFF;
> >>>>>>>+ } else if (!strcmp(buf, "on")) {
> >>>>>>>+ return BDRV_DETECT_ZEROES_ON;
> >>>>>>>+ } else if (!strcmp(buf, "unmap")) {
> >>>>>>>+ return BDRV_DETECT_ZEROES_UNMAP;
> >>>>>>>+ } else {
> >>>>>>>+ error_setg(errp, "invalid value for detect-zeroes: %s",
> >>>>>>>+ buf);
> >>>>>>>+ }
> >>>>>>>+ return BDRV_DETECT_ZEROES_OFF;
> >>>>>>>+}
> >>>>>>Isn't there QAPI generated code that you can use instead of open-coding
> >>>>>>this conversion between string and enum values?
> >>>>>Actually I have no idea. As you pointed out in the qapi patch I sent
> >>>>>it was quite hard for me to crawl through the whole stuff as one who is not
> >>>>>familiar with it. Can somebody advise here? Anyhow, I wonder
> >>>>>how this would work since qapi doesn't know the C Macros.
> >>>>QAPI does generate C enums, so you should take whatever identifier it
> >>>>uses instead of defining your own macros. You may need to include
> >>>>qapi-types.h for this. It also creates a *_lookup array that maps enum
> >>>>IDs to strings.
> >>>Ah, cool stuff, thank you. I found the enum and the lookup array,
> >>>but is there also a function that maps a string to an enum ID?
> >>I don't think so, but if you need it, you're probably doing something
> >>wrong because QAPI already calls you with an enum parameter and not a
> >>char* one.
> >I am in blockdev_init and want to set dinfo->bdrv->detect_zeroes to
> >the correct ID. Do you have a fast solution? Everything else in this
> >function is not using QAPI calls.
>
> Actually, there is already a manual parsing for the werror and rerror in this function.
>
> I think for the future there might be need for a generic function that maps a string
> to the ID of an enum object.
>
> If you don't have objections I would leave the parsing function as is for the moment.
Ah, so this is not for actual QAPI code, but the command line. Yeah, I
guess that's okay then, at least for the moment.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-08 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-07 0:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3] block: optimize zero writes with bdrv_write_zeroes Peter Lieven
2014-05-07 2:52 ` Eric Blake
2014-05-07 14:26 ` Peter Lieven
2014-05-07 15:19 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-05-07 15:26 ` Peter Lieven
2014-05-07 15:38 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-05-07 15:45 ` Peter Lieven
2014-05-07 16:02 ` Peter Lieven
2014-05-08 7:44 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2014-05-07 16:13 ` Peter Lieven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-07 0:01 Peter Lieven
2014-05-07 0:19 ` Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140508074424.GB4034@noname.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).