From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58959)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1WifxL-0008Je-OC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 04:15:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1WifxC-0008Oi-LO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 04:14:59 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]:60524)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1WifxC-0008OY-Ek
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 04:14:50 -0400
Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id bs8so931390wib.0
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 09 May 2014 01:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 10:14:46 +0200
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20140509081446.GA12865@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
References: <1399371550-5212-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
	<5368C332.3040302@web.de> <53694E1F.4090708@redhat.com>
	<20140507082421.GB4045@noname.str.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140507082421.GB4045@noname.str.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Fix open flags with BDRV_O_SNAPSHOT
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:24:21AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Perhaps the monitor should be changed to avoid printing so many useless
> control characters, then we'd hit the limit less often...
> 
> Stefan, didn't you plan to do something like this? Or was it unrelated?

I encountered this when working on readline for qemu-io.  It's been a
while but I remember it's not a trivial fix, would require reworking the
readline or monitor code.

Stefan