From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Jun Li <juli@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, junmuzi@gmail.com, famz@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] snapshot: fixed bdrv_get_full_backing_filename can not get correct full_backing_filename
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:40:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140514124036.GD16683@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399739757-3111-1-git-send-email-juli@redhat.com>
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:35:57AM +0800, Jun Li wrote:
> From: Jun Li <junmuzi@gmail.com>
>
> This patch fixed the following bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084302 .
>
> path_combine can not calculate the correct full path name for backing_file.
> Such as:
> create a snapshot chain:
> sn2->sn1->$BASE_IMG
> backing file is : /home/wookpecker/img.qcow2
> sn1 : /home/woodpecker/tmp/sn1
> sn2 : /home/woodpecker/tmp/sn2
> when create sn2, path_combine can not got a correct path for $BASE_IMG.
>
> In this patch, will check the backing_filename is a symlink or not firstly,
> then return the full(absolute) path via realpath.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jun Li <junmuzi@gmail.com>
> ---
> block.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Please fix your patch email submission process so it doesn't send the
same patch multiple times.
You've done this several times in the past. It makes patch review more
difficult than it needs to be for reviewers. If I have to compare
several emails and figure out which patch is the right one before
reviewing I'm inclined not to review at all.
Thanks,
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-14 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-10 16:35 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] snapshot: fixed bdrv_get_full_backing_filename can not get correct full_backing_filename Jun Li
2014-05-12 15:15 ` Eric Blake
2014-05-18 10:34 ` Jun Li
2014-05-25 13:37 ` Jun Li
2014-05-25 13:35 ` Jun Li
2014-05-14 12:40 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2014-05-14 13:05 ` Fam Zheng
2014-05-17 12:37 ` Jun Li
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-10 16:32 Jun Li
2014-05-10 16:30 Jun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140514124036.GD16683@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=juli@redhat.com \
--cc=junmuzi@gmail.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).