From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Cc: benoit.canet@irqsave.net, pkrempa@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] block: Auto-generate node_names for each BDS entry
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 11:39:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140516093927.GC4508@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140515184103.GM8452@localhost.localdomain>
Am 15.05.2014 um 20:41 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
> The only thing I don't like about moving this further back in the
> patch series is it makes the earlier patches untestable; I can't
> easily test the usage of the node-names for various intermediate BDS
> because they don't have node-names set. So that means I'll just need
> to rebase the patches prior to sending.
I don't quite follow. Can't you always manually assign node-names? This
is how libvirt is supposed to use the interface.
I'm not totally sure whether automatically generated node-names are
a good idea, but I can see how they are useful with human monitor users
which may not specify a node-name everywhere (I've used device_add
without an ID often enough, only to find that I can't remove the device
any more). We should just make sure that they are really only used by
human users.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-16 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-15 3:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] block: Modify block-commit to use node-names Jeff Cody
2014-05-15 3:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] block: Auto-generate node_names for each BDS entry Jeff Cody
2014-05-15 11:58 ` Benoît Canet
2014-05-15 12:06 ` Jeff Cody
2014-05-15 12:32 ` Benoît Canet
2014-05-15 12:37 ` Jeff Cody
2014-05-15 14:11 ` Eric Blake
2014-05-15 15:59 ` Eric Blake
2014-05-15 18:41 ` Jeff Cody
2014-05-15 19:12 ` Eric Blake
2014-05-16 9:39 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2014-05-16 11:35 ` Jeff Cody
2014-05-16 12:47 ` Eric Blake
2014-05-16 17:16 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-05-15 3:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] block: add helper function to determine if a BDS is in a chain Jeff Cody
2014-05-15 11:48 ` Benoît Canet
2014-05-15 14:16 ` Eric Blake
2014-05-15 14:24 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-05-15 14:31 ` Jeff Cody
2014-05-15 3:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] block: make 'top' argument to block-commit optional Jeff Cody
2014-05-15 11:47 ` Benoît Canet
2014-05-15 11:49 ` Jeff Cody
2014-05-15 15:07 ` Eric Blake
2014-05-15 3:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] block: Accept node-name arguments for block-commit Jeff Cody
2014-05-15 12:09 ` Benoît Canet
2014-05-15 15:42 ` Eric Blake
2014-05-15 18:04 ` Jeff Cody
2014-05-15 3:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] block: extend block-commit to accept a string for the backing file Jeff Cody
2014-05-15 12:26 ` Benoît Canet
2014-05-15 12:57 ` Eric Blake
2014-05-15 13:10 ` Jeff Cody
2014-05-15 13:14 ` Eric Blake
2014-05-15 16:06 ` Eric Blake
2014-05-15 18:22 ` Jeff Cody
2014-05-15 18:52 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140516093927.GC4508@noname.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=benoit.canet@irqsave.net \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).