From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wn7Y3-00073G-Im for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 10:31:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wn7Xx-0001ip-MR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 10:31:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:57518) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wn7Xx-0001ij-Gs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 10:31:09 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id md12so1472561pbc.15 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 07:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:31:06 -0400 From: Kevin O'Connor Message-ID: <20140521143106.GA9576@morn.localdomain> References: <1400270365-12316-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1400270365-12316-4-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20140520215433.GA19697@morn.localdomain> <537C8A51.2080008@redhat.com> <20140521140538.GA8069@morn.localdomain> <537CB5AE.1080203@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <537CB5AE.1080203@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] target-i386: get CPL from SS.DPL List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 04:18:22PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 21/05/2014 16:05, Kevin O'Connor ha scritto: > >On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 01:13:21PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >>I cannot reproduce this. I can see the breakage with current master, and I > >>can see your patch fixing it. It keeps working with these changes. Please > >>try branch cpl-queue at git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git and see if it > >>works for you too. > > > >Apologies - somehow your patch 1 got misapplied to my tree. Testing > >with the tree above works fine. > > Should I take this as a Tested-by? :) Sure. I boot tested several old images and haven't seen any regressions. Thanks. -Kevin