From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnggY-0002zc-E2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 00:02:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnggS-00065X-2u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 00:02:22 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26451) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnggR-00065R-R3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 00:02:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 12:02:24 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20140523040224.GF1668@T430.nay.redhat.com> References: <1400794231-27403-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> <1400794231-27403-7-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1400794231-27403-7-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/7] iotests: Drop Python version from 065's Shebang List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz Cc: Kevin Wolf , Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Markus Armbruster On Thu, 05/22 23:30, Max Reitz wrote: > Test 065 specified python2 to be used in its Shebang; this might not > work on systems without a python2 symlink and furthermore it is now > counter-productive, as the check script compares the Shebang to > "#!/usr/bin/env python" and only uses the Python interpreter selected by > configure on an exact match. > > Signed-off-by: Max Reitz > --- > tests/qemu-iotests/065 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/065 b/tests/qemu-iotests/065 > index ab5445f..e89b61d 100755 > --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/065 > +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/065 > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -#!/usr/bin/env python2 > +#!/usr/bin/env python > # > # Test for additional information emitted by qemu-img info on qcow2 > # images > -- > 1.9.3 > > If you decide to keep this patch (see my comments in 5/7), Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng