Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3, ping] SMBIOS cleanup round

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 01:13:18PM -0400, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:44:48PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:09:52AM -0400, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> > > Changelog:
> > > 
> > > new in v4:
> > >   - slightly improved commit blurbs
> > > 
> > > v3:
> > >   - endian-ness fix (1/3) now correctly handles cpuid version and features
> > >   - included documentation (qemu-options.hx) for type 0 uefi flag (2/3)
> > >   - fixed type 17 field sizes ("word" means 16 bits, not 32 :) :)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > v2:
> > >   - fix endian-ness for *all* larger-than-8bit fields (patch 1/2)
> > >   - resubmit type0 update (2/2) with appropriate endian-ness fix
> > >     for 64-bit field.
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks!
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/350248/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/350253/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/350252/
> 
> Not sure where we left this, was somebody going to pull these, or are
> we waiting for the unit tests:
> 
> > One question: we don't seem to have unit-test for this
> > interface in qemu, do we?
> > I would like to see at least a basic test along the lines of
> > tests/acpi-test.c: run bios to load tables from QEMU,
> > then do some basic checks on the tables that bios loaded.
> 
> ... in which case:
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/353072/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/353073/
> 
> Wondering if I should send out another series containing all five, or
> if the first three are already "accepted", in which case "ping" only
> on the latter two :)
> 
> Thanks much,
> --Gabriel

These are all in my tree.
I plan to send pull request Thursday.

-- 
MST