From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: "Marcin Gibuła" <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] thread-pool: fix deadlock when callbacks depends on each other
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:01:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140604100156.GF26902@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538C248F.2000801@beyond.pl>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:15:27AM +0200, Marcin Gibuła wrote:
> When two coroutines submit I/O and first coroutine depends on second to
> complete (by calling bdrv_drain_all), deadlock may occur.
bdrv_drain_all() is a very heavy-weight operation. Coroutines should
avoid it if possible. Please post the file/line/function where this
call was made, perhaps there is a better way to wait for the other
coroutine. This isn't a fix for this bug but it's a cleanup.
> This is because both requests may have completed before thread pool notifier
> got called. Then, when notifier gets executed and first coroutine calls
> aio_pool() to make progress, it will hang forever, as notifier's descriptor
> has been already marked clear.
>
> This patch fixes this, by deferring clearing notifier until no completions
> are pending.
>
> Without this patch, I could reproduce this bug with snapshot-commit with
> about 1 per 10 tries. With this patch, I couldn't reproduce it any more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Gibula <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
> ---
This is an interesting bug that definitely needs a test case to prevent
regressions in the future.
Please take a look at tests/test-thread-pool.c and add a test to it. It
can be reproduced deterministically - just call aio_poll() after the
dummy worker functions have both completed. Then the next aio_poll()
call in the thread pool callback will suffer the problem you described.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-04 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-02 7:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] thread-pool: fix deadlock when callbacks depends on each other Marcin Gibuła
2014-06-04 10:01 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2014-06-04 10:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-04 10:31 ` Marcin Gibuła
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140604100156.GF26902@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=m.gibula@beyond.pl \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).