From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55137) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsitN-0003LJ-Ln for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 21:24:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsitI-0005H6-0F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 21:24:25 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([2a01:4f8:120:8448::d00d]:44806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsitH-0005Gf-Lb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 21:24:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 03:21:04 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov Message-ID: <20140606012104.GA27257@pd.tnic> References: <1401984741-26882-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <539099B6.2090000@suse.de> <53909A41.1060800@redhat.com> <53909D79.1070609@suse.de> <53909E53.9050300@redhat.com> <53909E9C.6080009@suse.de> <5390A06A.9070200@redhat.com> <5390A1A9.40602@suse.de> <20140605174801.GQ17594@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <5390EE1A.9080503@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5390EE1A.9080503@suse.de> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] GET_EMULATED_CPUID support with "allow-emulation" option List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Eduardo Habkost , kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christian Borntraeger , "Gabriel L. Somlo" , "Jason J. Herne" , Paolo Bonzini , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= , Michael Mueller On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 12:24:26AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > But can we drop the EMULATED name somehow? Can we rename [1] the ioctl > to say GET_UNSUPPORTED_CPUID or something along those lines? The name > is just a really really bad pick. What do you mean, a "bad pick" :-P? I added extra care in naming that functionality what it is - bitfield in CPUID format of *emulated* features. Unsupported is wrong too - we do support them if we enable them explicitly. :-) How about GET_NOT_REALLY_FAST_BUT_STILL_NOT_FAST_ENOUGH_AS_IN_HW_FAST_CPUID? :-P -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --