From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57209)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nchip@afflict.kos.to>) id 1WsqK5-0008Nq-T5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 05:20:30 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nchip@afflict.kos.to>) id 1WsqK5-0000NT-0X
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 05:20:29 -0400
Received: from [2001:4b98:dc0:45:216:3eff:fe3d:166f] (port=53464
	helo=afflict.kos.to) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nchip@afflict.kos.to>) id 1WsqK4-0000N0-Q1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 05:20:28 -0400
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 12:20:26 +0300
From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <20140606092026.GA30155@afflict.kos.to>
References: <1399721153-22248-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
	<CAFEAcA-mSVEhGJmatMY9CpQFNjQO+jW1yCDKMiGiTkTHtVq7ZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140605131134.GA16772@afflict.kos.to>
	<CAFEAcA-3fF9-QjbpzH3xKwvNTc9BLYc1OdyCz-9a3tHYOG1S=g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-3fF9-QjbpzH3xKwvNTc9BLYc1OdyCz-9a3tHYOG1S=g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user/uname: Return correct uname
 string for x86_64
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 02:21:42PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 June 2014 14:11, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 03:07:59PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> Ping!
> >
> > Looks good, I'll collect this and other linux-user patches and submit linux-user update
> > by tomorrow.
 
> Does that include the set you did fixing gcc 4.9 compiles?
> I forget whether that had issues that needed a v2 or not.

The only issue is that nobody reviewed it. I've updated the patchset
a bit with better description and replaced ifdeffing of
restore_fpu_state with removin the lines. I'll send it on the list 
again so people have another chance to look at the patches.

Riku