From: gleb@kernel.org
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Alexander Graf" <agraf@suse.de>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Gabriel L. Somlo" <gsomlo@gmail.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
"Michael Mueller" <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] GET_EMULATED_CPUID support with "allow-emulation" option
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 16:29:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140606132907.GR4715@minantech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53909A41.1060800@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 06:26:41PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 05/06/2014 18:24, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
> >
> >On 05.06.14 18:12, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >>This implements GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID support using an explicit option
> >>for it:
> >>"allow-emulation". We don't want any emulated feature to be enabled by
> >>accident,
> >>so they will be enabled only if the user explicitly wants to allow them.
> >
> >So is this an all-or-nothing approach? I would really prefer to override
> >individual bits.
>
> You can still disable them with "cpu foo,-movbe,allow-emulation".
>
> >Also, I don't think the line "emulated" is the right one to draw. We
> >"emulate" SVM or VMX too, but still enable them by default as soon as we
> >think they're ready enough.
>
> Well, I disagreed with the whole KVM_GET_EMULATED_CPUID concept for MOVBE
> too for example. It seemed overengineered to me, sooner or later we might
> graduate MOVBE out of KVM_GET_EMULATED_CPUID as well.
Can you remind me what was your argument against
KVM_GET_EMULATED_CPUID? Where do you want to move MOVBE to? Supported
cpuid? That will make some CPU models unreasonably slow on hosts
that do not support MOVBE natively. KVM is not in a busyness of
instruction emulation, yes sometimes there is no choice (IO/real mode),
sometimes emulating a feature is beneficial (x2apic) and sometimes
guest cannot workaround missing feature, so by emulating it you allow
guest functionality that is impossible otherwise (SVM/VMX). MOVBE (and
MONITOR/MWAIT) is not in any of those categories. By forcing emulation
upon unsuspecting guest you force it to use much slower alternative for
what it can do by other means.
>
> However, for MONITOR/MWAIT it makes some sense.
>
> Paolo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-06 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-05 16:12 [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] GET_EMULATED_CPUID support with "allow-emulation" option Eduardo Habkost
2014-06-05 16:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/2] kvm: Implement kvm_arch_get_emulated_cpuid() Eduardo Habkost
2014-06-05 16:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/2] target-i386: Add "allow-emulation" X86CPU property Eduardo Habkost
2014-06-05 19:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/2 v2] target-i386: Add "x-allow-emulation" " Eduardo Habkost
2014-06-05 22:27 ` Alexander Graf
2014-06-05 16:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] GET_EMULATED_CPUID support with "allow-emulation" option Alexander Graf
2014-06-05 16:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-05 16:40 ` Alexander Graf
2014-06-05 16:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-05 16:45 ` Alexander Graf
2014-06-05 16:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-05 16:54 ` Alexander Graf
2014-06-05 16:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-05 17:19 ` Eduardo Habkost
2014-06-05 17:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-05 18:02 ` Eduardo Habkost
2014-06-05 19:12 ` Eduardo Habkost
2014-06-05 19:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-05 19:45 ` Eric Blake
2014-06-05 19:52 ` Eduardo Habkost
2014-06-05 16:58 ` Alexander Graf
2014-06-05 17:48 ` Eduardo Habkost
2014-06-05 22:24 ` Alexander Graf
2014-06-06 1:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-06 2:37 ` Eduardo Habkost
2014-06-06 11:16 ` Alexander Graf
2014-06-06 18:38 ` Eduardo Habkost
2014-06-05 17:17 ` Eduardo Habkost
2014-06-05 17:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-05 17:52 ` Eduardo Habkost
2014-06-05 17:34 ` Eduardo Habkost
2014-06-06 13:29 ` gleb [this message]
2014-06-05 18:11 ` Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140606132907.GR4715@minantech.com \
--to=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=gsomlo@gmail.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).