From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WuInL-0007ph-IV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:56:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WuInB-0003t0-Op for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:56:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12478) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WuInB-0003st-Ge for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:56:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:56:56 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20140610095656.GG7423@redhat.com> References: <20140609103005.GA25281@redhat.com> <20140609114030.GA4365@redhat.com> <20140610095148.GC12425@G08FNSTD100614.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140610095148.GC12425@G08FNSTD100614.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/29] NUMA series and hostmem improvements List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Hu Tao Cc: Yasunori Goto , Paolo Bonzini , Igor Mammedov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Habkost On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:51:48PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 02:40:30PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 01:30:05PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 06:25:05PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote: > > > > note: this series is based on MST's pci tree. > > > > > > No, please rebase on top of numa branch in my tree, not on > > > pci branch. > > > I applied a bunch of your there and don't want > > > spend time going over them again. > > > > > > > If you want me to drop some patches, pls mention this > > in the cover letter. But you don't need to keep > > reposting everything. > > 4 patches dropped from your numa tree. OK, which ones? > And do you mind patches > reordering? I rebased v5 on commit 7a3af0813f9, the patches keep in > order as in v4. Those patches with your Acked-by line are cherry-picked > from your numa tree without conflict. Are you OK with this? > > Hu I'd like to avoid reposting same patches. Can't you rebase on top of 0b85e768de158cf815003638df228ba1424c6c3b? What's the problem? -- MST