qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, sbruno@ignoranthack.me, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rules.mak: remove $(sort) from extract-libs
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 22:56:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140616145611.GB2683@T430.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402929805-16836-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On Mon, 06/16 16:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Duplicate removal was added to extract-libs in order to avoid including
> the same library multiple times into the linking command line; this could
> potentially happen when using "foo.mo-libs" (which adds the library to
> all components, causing it to appear N times if the module is composed
> of N objects).  However, sorting and removing duplicates causes problems
> with static linking, and also with space-separated linker options as
> found in some Mac OS X packaging systems.  Furthermore, the "optimization"
> is really a non-problem since we do not expect .mo modules to be composed
> of many files.
> 
> Reported-by: Sean Bruno <sbruno@ignoranthack.me>
> Tested-by: Sean Bruno <sbruno@ignoranthack.me>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> 	Peter, can you please apply this directly as it fixes the
> 	build and there are no other pending patches?
> ---
>  rules.mak | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/rules.mak b/rules.mak
> index dde8e00..945484e 100644
> --- a/rules.mak
> +++ b/rules.mak
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ QEMU_DGFLAGS += -MMD -MP -MT $@ -MF $(*D)/$(*F).d
>  # Same as -I$(SRC_PATH) -I., but for the nested source/object directories
>  QEMU_INCLUDES += -I$(<D) -I$(@D)
>  
> -extract-libs = $(strip $(sort $(foreach o,$1,$($o-libs))))
> +extract-libs = $(strip $(foreach o,$1,$($o-libs)))
>  expand-objs = $(strip $(sort $(filter %.o,$1)) \
>                    $(foreach o,$(filter %.mo,$1),$($o-objs)) \
>                    $(filter-out %.o %.mo,$1))

I was wondering about the $(sort), now this matches what I proposed in

http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-06/msg02351.html

Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-16 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-16 14:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rules.mak: remove $(sort) from extract-libs Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-16 14:56 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2014-06-16 17:26 ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140616145611.GB2683@T430.redhat.com \
    --to=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sbruno@ignoranthack.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).