From: Paul Burton <paul@archlinuxmips.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Paul Burton <paul@archlinuxmips.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix ipc(SEMCTL, ...) argument handling
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:10:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140623231010.GF4377@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8n_6L0gQy3H2ogi-AvrqadiK4Y7euhtbnuQOQK8EVMoQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1267 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:42:14PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 23 June 2014 23:36, Paul Burton <paul@archlinuxmips.org> wrote:
> > Actually no, I don't think you're right about that afterall. The
> > argument union itself is never modified. I imagine if it were then it
> > would be painful in the case of the semctl syscall where the union is
> > passed directly as an argument, rather than as a pointer as it is for
> > the ipc syscall.
> >
> > What may be modified is the data pointed to by the pointers within union
> > semun. That is already handled by do_semctl & the translate functions it
> > calls.
>
> Except if you look at do_semctl you see code like:
> case GETVAL:
> case SETVAL:
> arg.val = tswap32(target_su.val);
> ret = get_errno(semctl(semid, semnum, cmd, arg));
> target_su.val = tswap32(arg.val);
> break;
>
> which clearly is just modifying fields in the target_semun union.
> So something's wrong (probably that code)...
Yes, both Linux & man semctl agree that GETVAL returns the value of
the semaphore as the return value of the syscall. So I believe the
assignment to target_su.val there is (functionally harmless) garbage.
Thanks,
Paul
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-23 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-23 21:40 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix ipc(SEMCTL, ...) argument handling Paul Burton
2014-06-23 22:12 ` Peter Maydell
2014-06-23 22:18 ` Paul Burton
2014-06-23 22:35 ` Peter Maydell
2014-06-23 23:06 ` Paul Burton
2014-06-23 23:21 ` Peter Maydell
2014-06-23 23:53 ` Paul Burton
2014-06-24 8:19 ` Peter Maydell
2014-06-24 9:13 ` Paul Burton
2014-06-23 22:36 ` Paul Burton
2014-06-23 22:42 ` Peter Maydell
2014-06-23 23:10 ` Paul Burton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140623231010.GF4377@gmail.com \
--to=paul@archlinuxmips.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=riku.voipio@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).