From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53678)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1Wzo9x-0003iA-9A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:26:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1Wzo9s-0007HG-Co
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:26:49 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47101)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1Wzo9s-0007Fb-5k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:26:44 -0400
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:27:04 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20140625142704.GC15277@redhat.com>
References: <A459CE38-2929-47A2-8683-8D7EAF0325C0@cisco.com>
	<20140625135207.GC14578@redhat.com>
	<AC6F8B59-DE04-4F32-8D22-5B348680AA75@cisco.com>
	<CADDJ2=N2vxsy7tgvu0UWuzwBLZQ=KVh_KxACk67ZPjjJNRT71Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<A8A6A4DC-E474-45BB-A583-F73405F91F34@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A8A6A4DC-E474-45BB-A583-F73405F91F34@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] vhost-user: broken mem regions
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Damjan Marion (damarion)" <damarion@cisco.com>
Cc: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Nikolay Nikolaev <n.nikolaev@virtualopensystems.com>

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:20:56PM +0000, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote:
>=20
> On 25 Jun 2014, at 16:13, Nikolay Nikolaev <n.nikolaev@virtualopensyste=
ms.com> wrote:
>=20
> > >> - it will require changes on the user side also
> > >
> > > why would it?
> > > format seems unchanged, right?
> >=20
> > yes, but it will happen that multiple regions have same FD so call to=
 mmap()
> > should look different, I=E2=80=99m still playing with this on user si=
de...
> > but then you shoudl somehow accumulate the sizes and send just a sing=
le fd, something along these lines.=20
>=20
> Yes, so I=E2=80=99m not very happy with that approach and looking if th=
ere is better proposal,=20
> or at least wider agreement how to address this issue.
>=20
> Damjan

still not sure what the issue is ...