From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45891) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0Bqr-0005Dg-85 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:44:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0Bqe-0005p6-MW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:44:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13247) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0Bqe-0005p2-FK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:44:28 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:44:25 -0400 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20140626114425.25e37658@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <53AC3F09.2070705@redhat.com> References: <1403073840-32603-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1403073840-32603-22-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <87simrd6lu.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <53AC3F09.2070705@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2.1 21/36] qapi event: convert BLOCK_IO_ERROR and BLOCK_JOB_ERROR List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Markus Armbruster , wenchaoqemu@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:40:57 +0200 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 26/06/2014 17:37, Markus Armbruster ha scritto: > > Paolo Bonzini writes: > > > >> From: Wenchao Xia > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia > >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > > > > This broke tests/qemu-iotests/041. Apparently, the BLOCK_JOB_ERROR > > event changed from > > > > {'timestamp': {'seconds': 1403796871, 'microseconds': 446502}, > > 'data': {'device': 'drive0', > > - bdrv_emit_qmp_error_event(job->bs, QEVENT_BLOCK_JOB_ERROR, action, is_read); > + qapi_event_send_block_job_error(bdrv_get_device_name(bs), > > Should have been job->bs. Yeah, patch is underway. > > > 'action': 'ignore', > > 'operation': 'write'}, > > 'event': 'BLOCK_JOB_ERROR'} > > > > to > > > > {'timestamp': {'seconds': 1403796674, 'microseconds': 63271}, > > 'data': {'device': '', > > 'action': 'report', > > I suppose ignore vs. report is just from pasting two different sections? > > Paolo > > > 'operation': 'write'}, > > 'event': 'BLOCK_JOB_ERROR'} > > > > losing the value of device, which breaks qemu-iotests/041's tests of > > data/device. > > > > Please fix. > > > > >