From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48793)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>) id 1X2Bne-00004q-9R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:05:39 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>) id 1X2BnZ-0001Iv-Jl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:05:38 -0400
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([2002:c35c:fd02::1]:43123)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>) id 1X2BnZ-0001Et-Cn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:05:33 -0400
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 05:05:08 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <20140702040508.GK18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20140624212450.GB18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<53A9EE7E.4020802@twiddle.net>
	<20140625070117.GD18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<20140626055541.GF18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<53B1AEEF.8010108@twiddle.net>
	<20140630205635.GG18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<53B2E9CA.4040802@twiddle.net>
	<20140701175036.GJ18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<CAFEAcA8xhi9yC1yGEgwLNJa=cFZpVv2W+1uPW=Tjba7DNWmxSg@mail.gmail.com>
	<53B2FE3B.6050306@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53B2FE3B.6050306@twiddle.net>
Sender: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] alpha qemu arithmetic exceptions
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:30:19AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/01/2014 11:23 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 1 July 2014 18:50, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >> Which glibc version?  Better yet, could you throw preprocessed source
> >> my way?  UP1000 box is not in a good shape and I'd rather avoid trying to run
> >> full glibc builds on it ;-/
> > 
> > Would a 164LX be a useful (ie non-duplicate) extra resource
> > for testing this stuff? That has a 21164 (EV5) in it. I haven't
> > tried to boot it for some years, but I can have a try at
> > resurrecting it if it would be helpful...
> 
> An ev5 would be a good fallback.

OK, DS10 resurrected and so far seems to be stable (I'll know by tomorrow;
there's a possibility that chipset heatsink is dodgy, but so far it seems
to be doing OK).  That gives us a EV6 box.

Which glibc version it is?  I don't see such failures with your
axp/axp-next (head at 6b38f4e7f); could you post the details on your
reproducer?  I've tried to guess the likely version by glibc.git, but
I don't see nearbyint tests with such argument in any version there,
so I couldn't find it that way...