From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51527) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2F0L-0002CC-Az for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 03:31:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2F0F-0000w3-1l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 03:30:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5230) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2F0E-0000va-Pq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 03:30:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 09:32:50 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20140702063250.GA4015@redhat.com> References: <201406240908546812611@sangfor.com> <20140624054947.GA25614@redhat.com> <201406241445428077130@sangfor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201406241445428077130@sangfor.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stablebranch? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Zhang Haoyu Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:45:44PM +0800, Zhang Haoyu wrote: > >> Hi, all > >> > >> Which version is best for commercial product, qemu-2.0.0 or other versions? > >> Any advices? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Zhang Haoyu > > > >Use one of the downstreams: Red Hat, Fedora, Debian all ship QEMU and > >have active QEMU maintainers developing the distribution. > > > How to get the latest qemu distribution shipped by RedHat? > > Thanks, > Zhang Haoyu You can try http://www.redhat.com/contact/sales.html and/or https://engage.redhat.com/forms/virtualization-contact-us > >-- > >MST