From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.1?!?] AioContext: speed up aio_notify
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 12:26:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140704102637.GC4233@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53B6576B.7040304@redhat.com>
Am 04.07.2014 um 09:27 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> Il 04/07/2014 09:23, Ming Lei ha scritto:
> >I think it is good and better to go to 2.1, and it should save lots of
> >write syscall.
> >
> >Also should regression be caused, the per thread trick may be
> >resorted to, which should be simple.
>
> If we have the "right" solution (which we do, unlike the plug/unplug
> case), and the benefit is there but limited, I don't see a reason to
> rush another patch in 2.1.
>
> Some reasonable level of performance degradation or increased host
> CPU utilization was expected in 2.1; of course 40% is not
> reasonable.
>
> >With multi virtqueue's coming for virtio-blk, it should save more, and I
> >also plan to use the improved qemu bh to help merge requests from
> >multi queue, without introducing extra notifier.
>
> But virtio-blk multiqueue is 2.2 material, and so is coalescing of
> irqfd writes. I think Kevin or Stefan should queue this patch (with
> the smp_mb optimization, IMHO) for block-next.
We have a rather long freeze phase this time (which I think is a good
thing). This patch fixes a regression, even if it may not be the most
important one because it is in experimental code. But I still think that
this time in the hard freeze is the right time to commit patches like
this. I would be very hesitant with such a patch like in the two weeks
before the release, but at this point I'm very open to including it.
All that requiring proper review and testing, of course. I reviewed it
and it looks good to me and Stefan seems to have reviewed it as well, so
I think it just needs a bit more testing.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-04 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-03 16:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.1?!?] AioContext: speed up aio_notify Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-03 18:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-07-04 6:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-04 7:23 ` Ming Lei
2014-07-04 7:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-04 10:26 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2014-07-04 10:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 8:28 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140704102637.GC4233@noname.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).