From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
ming.lei@canonical.com, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] virtio-blk: fix issues with unified virtio-blk request handling
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 14:23:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140709122316.GB4537@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404893149-27701-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
Am 09.07.2014 um 10:05 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> v3:
> * Add Christian's Tested-by: [Kevin]
> * Resolved merge conflict in Patch 4 with qemu.git/master [Kevin]
>
> This series fixes issues recently introduced when unifying virtio-blk
> dataplane's request handling with non-dataplane virtio-blk.
>
> The problems include broken memory allocation for dataplane requests and a
> performance regression for non-dataplane. See the patches for details.
Thanks, applied to the block branch.
Kevin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-09 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-09 8:05 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] virtio-blk: fix issues with unified virtio-blk request handling Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-07-09 8:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/4] virtio-blk: avoid dataplane VirtIOBlockReq early free Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-07-09 8:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/4] dataplane: do not free VirtQueueElement in vring_push() Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-07-09 8:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/4] virtio-blk: avoid g_slice_new0() for VirtIOBlockReq and VirtQueueElement Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-07-09 8:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] virtio-blk: embed VirtQueueElement in VirtIOBlockReq Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-07-09 12:23 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140709122316.GB4537@noname.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).