From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X5aK6-0002HY-2O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 08:53:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X5aJz-0004ad-TL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 08:53:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X5aJz-0004aL-KH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 08:53:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:22:26 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20140711125226.GA17415@grmbl.mre> References: <1403602356-13687-1-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de> <874mz919w5.fsf@troll.troll> <20140709042557.GA10283@grmbl.mre> <20140709104457.GE27615@grmbl.mre> <20140709105620.GG27615@grmbl.mre> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: catch unknown flag combinations in ram_load List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Juan Quintela , Peter Lieven , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , QEMU Developers , Paolo Bonzini On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [12:00:13], Peter Maydell wrote: > On 9 July 2014 11:56, Amit Shah wrote: > > On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [11:50:18], Peter Maydell wrote: > >> OK; we're treating those as bugs so yes, I think this is 2.1 > >> material. Has somebody other than the original author tested > >> it? (That's a step that would usually be done by Juan as the > >> maintainer.) If somebody can provide a Tested-by: I'm happy > >> to apply it to master. > > > > Not really sure if Juan did that as part of his 'thanks, applied' > > workflow, but I'll run this through the autotest migration tests and > > report back. > > Thanks; it seems better to double-check given where we are in > the release cycle. I tested using the autotest migration tests, which start a guest, migrate it, and then login to the guest to see if everything's fine. I used qemu-2.0 and qemu.git against qemu.git+patch and both tests passed fine. But since Peter and Eric have reservations, let's just postpone this till 2.2. That saves me from further tests as well! Amit